[1. CALL TO ORDER]
[2. MINUTES]
[00:00:12]
. >> CALL TO ORDER COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE. CITY COUNCIL SHOULD HAVE THE MINUTES FROM THE JULY 18 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE, ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS IS, THERE A MOVE TO APPROVE?
>> MOTION SECOND TO APPROVE THE MINUTES JULY 18TH ALL IN FAVOR
[3. BRIDLEWOOD DRIVE DISCUSSION]
AYE. BRIDLEWOOD DISCUSSION, MAYOR PROIN FRONT OF YOU HAVE A MEMO OF TIMELINE FROM MILE ENS, MY VOVT EXCEPT FOR THE INITIAL INVOLVEMENT IN 1992 BUT I'M ASKING THIS COUNCIL TO PLACE ON FUTURE AGENDA ONCE DOCUMENTS CAN BE COMPLETED BY THE CITY MANAGER TO CREATE A DEVELOPMENT GULFSTREAM WITH ROCK HOUSE FARMS IN SPECIAL FINING AGREEMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE DIFFERENCE OF BRIDLEWOOD AND I THINK MANY OF YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT BUT JUST FOR THE SAKE OF THE PUBLIC, BRIDLEWOOD IS A PARTIALLY PAVED, PAVED IS A LOOSE TERM, PRIVATE ROAD THAT SERVES AS AN EASEMENT TO CROOK WOOD SUBDIVISION WHICH WAS APPROVED IN 1992 BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION WHICH ALLOWED ACCESS TO THIS SUBDIVISION VIA A PRIVATE EASEMENT IN THE COUNTY AND SO, THIS CREATES A WHOLE HOST OF ISSUES WHICH REQUIRED AT THE TIME AND STILL CONTINUES TO REQUIRE THE CREEK WOOD HOA TO PAIN TAKEN THIS ROAD. I WAS BROUGHT INTO THIS IN 2021 IN THE KPREEK WOOD HOA ASKED PLEA TO SEE IF THERE WAS A WAY THE CITY COULD HELP WITH THE MAINTENANCE AND OR TAKING OF BRIDLEWOOD. THAT WAS NOT A POSSIBILITY AT THE TIME SINCE WAS A PRIVATE EASEMENT IN THE COUNTY AND THE CREEK WOOD AGENT UNDERSTOOD THAT THE TIME.
FAST FORWARD THERE'S A GROUP ONE AND TWO DEVELOPED THAT WANT TO DEVELOP THE PROPERTY ON THE GARDNER FARM OFF SHELTON ROAD OH THERE'S A COUPLE OF INDIVIDUALS WANT TO DEVELOP LAND THAT WOULD ACCESS BRIDLEWOOD AT I GUESS THE EASTERN SIDE OFF SHELTON ROAD AND THAT NOW KIND OF TRIG TESHS POSSIBILITIES THAT THAT ROAD WOULD COME INTO THE CITY AND THE POSSIBILITY THAT THE CITY WOULD MAINTAIN IT, SO THERE'S A PORTION WHERE THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL ACTUALLY, THE PRELIMINARY PLAT HAS BEEN APPROVED FOR THIS SUBDIVISION BUT THEY WOULD HAVE ACCESS OFF BRIDLEWOOD DRIVE AND YOU HAVE A MAP IN FRONT OF YOU WHERE CAN YOU SEE THE GREEN AREA THAT'S HIGHLIGHTED OFF BRIDLEWOOD IS WHERE THE DEVELOPERS REQUIREMENTS WOULD BE AND THEN THEY BELIEVE BECAUSE OF THE DRIVE THAT THEY WOULD END AT THEIR PRIVATE DRIVE AND THE REMAINING PORTION WHICH INCLUDES A CULVERT AND THE REST OF BRIDLEWOOD DRIVE TO THE TERMINUS OF CREEK WOOD, THAT'S A PORTION WE ARE SEEKING A SOLUTION FOR, AND IN CONVERSATION WITH THE MAYOR, CREEK WOOD HOA AND SOME OTHERS WE DETERMINED THAT WE COULD POSTABLY HAVE A SHARED COST OF THE REMAINDER OF THAT ROAD WITH THE CREEK WOOD HOA AGREEING THROUGH VOTE ON PROPOSAL FOR SPECIAL ROAD FINANCING OF A HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS OVER TEN YEARS AND THE REMAINDER OF THAT CONSTRUCTION COST WOULD BE HANDLED BY THE CITY OF AUBURN WHICH IS ANOTHER HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS.
THE IDEA IS THAT THE DEVELOPER WOULD COMPLETE IT IN ENTIRETY DUE TO THE NATURE OF THE ROAD. IT WOULD BE HARD TO SPLIT UP THE CONSTRUCTION OF THAT AND SO FORTH, SO THE DEVELOPERS WOULD COMPLETE THE WHOLE ROAD AND THE CITY OF AUBURN WOULD REIMBURSE THE DEVELOPER FOR THE PORTION THAT WE WOULD POTENTIALLY BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AND WHAT CREEK WOOD HOA WOULD BE FINANCING.
SO THAT IS, THERE'S A LOT THERE AND I KNOW YOU CAN ALL READ SO IF YOU WANT TO SEE THE TIMELINE BUT AGAIN MY REQUEST TONIGHT IS SIMPLY TO ASK THAT WE PUT THIS OR WE ASK THE CITY MANAGER TO CREATE THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND SPECIAL FINANCING AGREEMENT
[00:05:03]
TO BE PLACED ON AGENDA AS SOON AS THE DOCUMENTS ARE PREPARED.>> MS. WITTEN THANKS FOR ALL YOUR HARD WORK GETTING THIS TOGETHER. ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE COUNCIL,
>> YES, CONGRESSMAN GRISWOLD HAD ONE.
>> I'M SORRY. I DIDN'T HEAR YOU.
>> WELL, THIS IS BASED ON A POLICY THAT AUBURN HAS OF THE DEVELOPER IMPROVING THE ROAD ACROSS THE DEVELOPER'S PROPERTY.
POLICY IS AT LEAD AS OLD I'M SURE AS 1992.
THE ISSUE WAS COMPLICATED IN TWO WAYS.
THE CITY SHOULD NEVER HAVE ACCEPTED THE SUBDIVISION PLAN IN THE BEGINNING. THE CITY SHOULD NOT HAVE VACATED ALSO THE EASEMENT TO IN ORDER COLLEGE.
I UNDERSTAND THAT THERE WAS AN EASEMENT TO NORTH COLLEGE.
>> NO THERE WAS NOT. >> SO, WHAT BEST FOR THE CITY NOW? IT OCCURS TO ME THAT THE CITY'S INVOLVEMENT SHOULD BE A BUSINESS DECISION, LIKE TAX ABATEMENT.
WILL WE WORK TO PROVIDE A SOLUTION TO BRIDLEWOOD DRIVE THAT WILL BENEFIT ALL THE PARTIES CONCERNED? THAT'S THE QUESTION. A SOLUTION THE SAME PARTIES HAVE AGREED UPON? I THINK WE SHOULD AND I BELIEVE IT WOULD BE THE BEST CHOICE OF THE CITIZENS OF AUBURN IF WE
>> I WOULD LIKE TO ASK THE CITY MANAGER A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS.
MY PARTNER SAID THIS IS BASED ON CITY POLICY.
THIS IS BASED ON CITY AND COUNTY SUBREGULATIONS IS THAT CORRECT?
>> TWOFOLD, COUNCILMAN MOREMAN CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, THE CITY DOES NOT FUND ROAD CONSTRUCTION OTHER THAN CERTAIN MAJOR CITY INITIATIVES THAT RESIDE IN YOUR BUDGET DOCUMENT.
I BELIEVE THAT'S WHAT YOU MAYBE REFERRING TO COUNCILMAN GRISWOLD AND REFERRING TO SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS, THAT BRIDLEWOOD R BRIDLEWOOD IS ON THE MAJOR OTHER STREET PLAN AND WHEN YOU SUBDIVIDE PROPERTY WHETHER CITY OR COUNTY YOU'VE GOT TO COMPLY WITH CERTAIN PARAMETERS. WITHOUT GETTING INTO TECHNICAL DETAIL THE DEVELOPER IN THIS INSTANT PER OUR SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS WHICH WERE ONLY ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND NOT THE CITY COUNCIL, REQUIRE THAT THE ROAD BE IMPROVED ALL THE WAY FROM SHELTON MILL ROAD, BECAUSE THAT'S THE EXISTING PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY TO, TEND OF THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION, WHICH YOU SEE THAT WOULD BE THE ENTIRE GREEN AND YELLOW PIECE ON HERE. THAT'S WHAT THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS REQUIRE AND ALL PLANNING COMMISSION REQUIREMENTS STATE. THE POLICY SIDE OF THIS IS COUNCILMAN MOREMAN IS REFERRING TO, THIS IS THE INSTRUCTIONS THE STAFF HAS LONG HAD FROM THE CITY COUNCIL.
WE DON'T BUILD ROADS FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPERS.
IT IS CERTAINLY WITHIN YOUR PER VIEW TO CHANGE THAT TO DO ONE OFF TRANSACTIONS WHAT HAVE YOU, THAT IS WHAT YOU DO AS POLICY-MAKERS THE STAFF IS HERE TO IMPLEMENT WHATEVER YOU
AND HAVE WE PAID A DEVELOPER IN THE PAST TO BUILD A ROAD ON BEHALF OF THE DEVELOPMENT SUBDIVISION?
>> OH, HAVE WE PAID? WE HAVE PAID TO ADD TO CERTA IMPROVEMENTS. WHERE WE'VE ASKED FOR AN ADDITIONAL LANE ON A ROAD OR WE WANTED SOMETHING DIFFERENT DONE THAT WAS ABOVE AND BEYOND WHAT WE COULD REQUIRE.
I DON'T KNOW OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD.
I'M LOOKING AT THE CITY EVENING NEAR EXECUTIVE SERVICES AND OTHERS, I CAN'T RECALL WHERE WE HAVE PAID A DEVELOPER JUST WITHOUT SOME VERY SPECIFIC PURPOSE.
WE HAD NO SPECIAL ROAD FINANCING BUT WE HAVE FINANCED THAT AND
THE DEVELOPERS PAID US BACK. >> WHAT LEVEL OF EFFORT WOULD IT TAKE ON THE PART OF THE STAFF TO DO A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND WHATEVER THIS LEASE OR THIS SPECIAL ROAD --
>> SPECIAL ROAD FINANCING THIS WOULD BE A DIFFERENT SPECIAL ROAD FINE ANDING DEAL THAN WE NORMALLY DO AND MORE STRAIGHT FORWARD BECAUSE WE WOULDN'T BE BORROWING MONEY SO STAFF WOULD DRAW UP A VERY BASIC AGREEMENT WE WOULD SEND TO THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR REVIEW PROBABLY NOT MORE THAN FOUR OR FIVE HOURS OF STAFF TIME COMBINED TO GET THAT DONE.
IT'S NOT COMPLICATED. THIS SHOULD FALL UNDER OUR RETAINER WITH OUR CITY ATTORNEYS ON THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.
WE DRAW THOSE UP FREQUENTLY. THEY MAINLY RESIDE WITH THE DEVELOPMENT. SERVICES DIRECTOR SCOTT CUMMINGS WHO WOULD PUT A FORM TO GO VET WITNESS THE DEVELOPER APPROVE IT WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE I DON'T KNOW HOW LONG IT WOULD
TAKE YOU. >> I THINK THAT'S ABOUT RIGHT.
[00:10:03]
I THINK 5-8 HOURS OF STAFF TIME. >> AND IF THE HOA AND DEVELOPER COME TO AGREEMENT TO SPLIT COSTS THAT'S ALL ON THEM? THAT DOESN'T HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE CITY CORRECT?
>> CORRECT. >> BASED ON THAT INFORMATION, I CAN'T JUSTIFY SPENDING CITY MONEY FOR A DEVELOPER'S ROAD WHEN HE IS REQUIRED TO DO CERTAIN THINGS UNDER THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF CITIES AND COUNTIES SO TO ME IT WOULD BE A WASTE OF EFFORT ON THE PART OF THE STAFF IF THE MAJORITY OF THE COUNCIL SHARES MY OPINION.
SO, AGAIN, I WOULD NOT SUPPORT PUTTING THIS ON AN AGENDA FOR FURTHER REVIEW, AND LET EVERYBODY ELSE DECIDE WHAT THEY WISH TO DO. SO THANK.
>> YES, THANK YOU. >> I'D LIKE TO SPEAK TO THAT.
I THINK IT'S CERTAINLY SOMETHING TO CONSIDER WHEN WE ASK STAFF TO DO CERTAIN THINGS, BUT I DO THINK THIS IS AS FAR AS DRAWING UP TWO DIFFERENT AGREEMENTS IS PRETTY ROUTINE IN WHAT OUR STAFF CAN HANDLE, AND 5-8 HOURS SEEMS TO BE A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME. THIS STEMS FROM A DECISION MADE BY A PLANNING COMMISSION IN 1992 THAT HAS CREATED THIS SITUATION AND IN 1992 DECISIONS WERE MADE RIGHT OR WRONG THAT HAVE BROUGHT US TO THIS. SO IT'S A UNIQUE SITUATION.
DO YOU KNOW OF MANY PRIVATE EASEMENTS THAT CONNECT A CITY ROAD TO A CITY SUBDIVISION THAT ARE NOT MAINTAINED BY THE CITY?
>> I'M LOOKING AGAIN AT MY DEVELOPMENT STAFF.
NOT OFF THE TOP OF OUR HEAD. I WOULD SAY.
THIS YOU GET INTO OUR RURAL AREAS AND SIMILAR TO THIS PEOPLE WANT PRIVACY, THEY WANT LARGE LOTS AND THEY DON'T WANT TO OFTEN BUILD PUBLIC STREETS. AND SO TO SAY FOR SURE NO WE HAVE SOME PEOPLE THAT PROBABLY ACCESS THEIR INDIVIDUAL HOMESTEADS VIA EASEMENTS BUT I DON'T KNOW IF WE WOULD CALL EIGHT GREATER SUBDIVISION OR NOT.
AND AGAIN THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR AND CITY EVENING NEAR ARE HAVING A CHAT. [INAUDIBLE]
>> LONGWOOD DRIVE? YES THERE, ARE FLAGS AS YOU CAN SEE AND GREG CAN YOU POINT THE DRIVEWAY TO WHERE THE GREEN AND THE YELLOW MEET? GO STRAIGHT UP FROM THERE.
THAT WILL BE, THOSE ARE ACTUALLY LOT LINES SO THEY WON'T BE EASEMENTS BUT THEY WOULD BE DOCUMENTED BY THE DEVELOPERS AND WHO MAINTAINS THAT SO YOU SEE FLAG LOTS FREQUENTLY BUT NOT THINGS THAT WE MAINTAIN TYPICALLY AND THEN WE DO HAVE A LOT OF PRIVATE DRIVES. WE DO FIND OVER TIME PEOPLE ALWAYS WANT THE CITY EVENTUALLY THE PRIVATE DRIVE THEY TEND TO WANT THE CITY EVENTUALLY TO TAKE IT OVER AND THAT'S JUST THE NATURE OF HOA'S OVER MANY YEARS NOT WANT TO GO MAINTAIN BUT I CAN'T THINK OF A RELEVANT EXAMPLE FOR THIS.
>> THANK YOU. AND THEN THE FLAG LOTS WERE DONE INTENTIONALLY TO CREATE THE END OF THEIR SUBDIVISION OR THEIR LOT LINES TO BE AT THE TERMINUS OF THAT LAST FLAG LOT WHICH THIS YELLOW HIGHLIGHT AND THE GREEN JAIME AREN'T EXACTLY TO THE SCALE OF THIS, BUT THE FLAG LOTS FROM THE, I WOULD SAY FROM THE INTENTION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT WAS SO THAT THE ROAD
REQUIREMENTS WOULD END THERE. >> I CAN'T SPEAK TO THAT DIRECTLY AS TO WHAT THEIR INTENT WAS SCOTT?
>> THAT THE MY ASSUMPTION IS THEY INTENDED TO STOP THE WORK IMPROVEMENTS THEY HAD TO DO AT THAT POINT THE NEAREST POINT THEY COULD GET TO SETTLE ON THE MILL ROAD AND SHORTEN THE AMOUNT OF INFRASTRUCTURE PUT IN IN ORDER TO HAVE A SHARED DRIVEWAY
OR SHARED ROAD TO ALL OF THEM. >> I WILL BE CLEAR IT MEANS OUR SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS REQUIREMENT WITH A 70 FOOT LOT WITH IT AT STREET. ONCE THAT'S DEDICATED THEN IT
MEETS IT. >> ANYBODY ELSE? QUESTIONS? COMMENTS?
YES, MAX. >> MR. MAYOR I WANT TO PLAN ON ABSTAINING FROM THIS VOTE SO I WANT TO LET YOU GUYS KNOW THAT.
>> MAYOR I WOULD CAUTION AND COUNCILMAN GRISWOLD I WOULD LIKE TO DO A ROLL CALL AND DOWN FOR THE RECORD SO IT'S EASIER ON
>> I HAVE A QUESTION IF I MAY MR. MAYOR.
IS PLANNING STAFF HAPPY WITH THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AS IT PERTAINS TO THE RESPONSIBILITY OF DEVELOPERS TO CONTINUE TO FUND THE ROAD SIDE OF THE DEVELOPMENT?
>> STAFF HAS NOT RECOMMENDED A CHANGE, AND I DON'T BELIEVE THE PLANNING OR ENGINEERING STAFF HAS DISCUSSED RECOMMENDING A
CHANGE AT THIS TIME. >> THIS POLICY IS LIKELY TO STAY
[00:15:03]
IN PLACE? >> THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS THEMSELVES AGAIN YOU DON'T HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO CHANGE THEM.
ONLY A PLANNING COMMISSION DOES BUT YOU DO HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT THE CITY IS GOING TO FUND SOMETHING.
>> YES, SIR. >> ONE OTHER POINT.
RIGHT NOW, WHEN I LOOK AT THIS, THERE'S CLEARLY A SIGN AS SOON AS YOU TURN OFF SHELTON MILL THAT SAYS "PRIVATE ROAD" SO THIS IS CONSIDERED A PRIVATE ROD TODAY CORRECT?
>> CRAIG, IT IS A PRIVATE EASEMENT TODAY.
>> SOLELY MAINTAINED BY THE HOA AND HAS BEEN SINCE 1992.
>> YES, AROUND THE TIME, ABSOLUTELY IT WOULD HAVE BEEN MAINTAINED FROM THE TOP BY THE HOA BY THE TIME THEY MADE THAT DEAL TO PRESENT THEY WOULD MAINTAIN IT WITH HOA DUES.
>> SO A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TO USE TAXPAYER MONEY TO BASE LICK IMPROVE A PRIVATE ROAD THAT, WOULD BE THE END RESULT OF THE
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT? >> NO, THE DEVELOPER WILL HAVE TO DEDICATE THIS AS A PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY AND THAT WOULD BE NOTED. IT'S PART OF THE SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS ANYWAY BUT THAT WOULD ACTUALLY BE NOTED IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS, IT WOULD HAVE TO BE DEDICATED RIGHT OF WAY BEFORE FUND COMING GO INTO IT.
>> ONLY TIME THAT WOULD HAPPEN IS IF WE ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT OTHERWISE HE'S SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DEVELOPING THE ROAD ALL THE WAY UP TO SUBDIVISION AND IF HE WANTS TO SUBMITTED WITNESS THE SUBDIVISION THAT'S THEIR
BUSINESS. >> PER THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS THAT IS THE REQUIREMENT.
>> THANK YOU. >> I JUST WANT TO SAY, OKAY, THE GREEN AREA IS COMING OFF SHELTON ROAD.
SO WE GET TO THE YELLOW, AND I WENT OUT AND LOOKED AT THIS, SO WHEN WE GET TO THE END OF THE GREEN, AND THAT YELLOW AREA ALL IS WOODED RIGHT NOW, IS THAT RIGHT?
>> NO, THAT YELL SO A LOOSELY PAVED ROAD THAT HAS A CULVERT THAT CONTINUES STARTS AND ENDS WHERE YOU SEE IT END IS WHERE THE SUBDIVISION ROAD BEGINS, WHICH IS PAST THAT YELLOW YOU
>> AND THAT ROAD IS A CITY STREET.
AND SHELTON IS A CITY STREET. >> THE GREEN IS DELINEATEING WHAT THE DEVELOPER IS OFFERING TO PAY FOR AT THIS STAGE IN THE SCENARIO THAT COUNCIL PERSON WITTEN IS BRINGING FORWARD THE YELLOW IS THE DOLLAR AMOUNT IN QUESTION, ABOUT $200,000
>> BUT BOTH THE GREEN AND THE YELLOW PERSON THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS WOULD MAKE A PUBLIC ROAD.
>> JUST ONE MORE THING, IF I MAY.
THIS IS THE ONLY IN AND OUT OF CREEKWOOD SUBDIVISION?
>> THERE ARE TWO EASEMENTS OUT OF CREEKWOOD SUBDIVISION THE THERE'S THIS ONE THAT IS TAKE ENKAIFR IN THEIR COVENANT AND THERE IS AN EASEMENT THROUGH PROPERTY TO WATERCRESS THAT WAS REQUIRED BY THE CITY FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS SO IF A CULVERT BLOWS OUT IN A STORM EVENT THERE'S A WAY INTO THE ASHTON PARK
SUBDIVISION. >> THAT WOULD REQUIRE SMALLER FIRST RESPONSE VEHICLES TO ACCESS IN EVENT OF EMERGENCY.
>> IN EVENT OF EMERGENCY WE DO EVERYTHING WE CAN TO GET IN THERE WITH WHATEVER VEHICLES WOULD FIT.
>> I JUST WANT TO POINT OUT 99.9 PERCENT OF THE TRAVEL I CAN GOES ON THE ROAD WE ARE DISCUSSING TONIGHT.
>> AT LEAST. >> HIGHER THAN THAT.
>> YES. >> ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? BETH, I APPRECIATE YOUR WORK IN PROVIDING THIS.
MANY OF US HAVE SPENT TIME OVER THE PAST COUPLE WEEKS INVESTIGATING AND UNDERSTANDING THIS SITUATION I'VE CERTAINLY BEEN A STALWART SUPPORTER OF OUR STAFF AND THE THINGS THEY HAVE IN PLACE TO MAKE AUBURN A GREAT COMMUNITY AND I BELIEVE THE COMMUNITY WE ALL LIVE AND RESIDE IN REFLECTS THAT.
I BELIEVE THIS IS AN UNUSUAL UNIQUE SITUATION THAT WAS BORN 30 YEARS AGO THAT IS PUT A DIFFICULTY ON THE RESIDENTS OF CREEKWOOD WHERE THEY CONTINUOUSLY HAVE TO PATCH A ROAD THAT CREATES HEARTACHE AND WORRY FOR THEM, AND I BELIEVE UNUSUAL NATURE OF THIS ASKS FOR AN UNUSUAL SOLUTION.
I APPRECIATE THE HOA MEMBERS. THEY HAVE DECIDED TO SPEND MORE MONEY AND TO BE COLLECT MORE MONEY EACH YEAR TO HELP PAY THIS DEBT OFF SO THEY HAVE SKIN IN THE GAME AND MADE THE DECISION AS A WAY OF FINALLY TRYING TO GET THIS FIXED AND I BELIEVE IT'S WORST US CONTINUING TO TALK ABOUT THE NEXT TWO WEEKS OR TWO MONTHS OR HOWEVER LOCK IT TAKES FOR THE STAFF TO PUT TOGETHER A
[00:20:06]
DEVELOP. AGREEMENT BECAUSE IT'S UNIQUE TO I'M COMMUNITY. SO I'M IN FAVOR WITH ASKING STAFF TO PUT TOGETHER A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.NO FURTHER COMMENTS? >> FORMAL MOTION.
>> I MOVE THAT THE COUNCIL VOTES TO ALLOW THE CITY MANAGER TO CREATE A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH ROCK HOUSE FARMS AND SPECIAL AGREEMENT WITH CREEKWOOD HOA . . . TO BE PLACED ON FUTURE AGENDA AS SOON AS THE DOCUMENTS ARE COMPLETED.
>> WE HAVE A MOTION SECOND, WE HAVE HAD DISCUSSION.
>> ROLL CALL. >> DO A ROLL CALL.
>> ABSTAIN. >> DAWSON YES, MA'AM.
>> GRISWOLD, NO. >> [INAUDIBLE]
>> WITTEN. >> FIVE YESES THREE NO ONE
ABSTENTION. >> WE WILL WORK TO GET THAT
[4. QUESTIONS ON THE AGENDA]
TOGETHER ON AGENDA ONCE ALL DOCUMENT ARE TO OURSATISFACTION. >> ANY QUESTIONS ON TONIGHT AGENDA FOR THE CITY MANAGER? CITY MANAGER, ANYTHING FOR US?
IS THERE A MOVE TO ADJOURN? >> SO MOVED.
>> WE ARE
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.