[ROLL CALL ]
[00:00:22]
>> BOB REICHENBACH, WENDY BIRMINGHAM.
>> DAVID WISDOM. >> JOSEPH A STEP.
>> HERE. >> WE HAVE A QUORUM AND WE SHALL CONTINUE WITH THEIR BUSINESS IN THEIR FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS FOR CITIZEN COMMUNICATION. IS THIS ON.
IF THERE IS ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION REGARDING ANY ISSUE RELATED TO LAND USE AND PLANNING THAT IS NOT PART OF THE AGENDA ITEM THIS IS THE TIME TO BRING IT TO HER ATTENTION NOW. IF YOU DO COME FORWARD ANY TIME YOU COME FORWARD IN THE PUBLIC HEARING OR AT THIS PORTION OF THE MEETING SIGNING BEFORE OR AFTER YOU LEAVE THE PODIUM.
IS ANYONE THAT WISHES TO BRING ANYTHING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION THAT IS NOT ON THE AGENDA.
I SEE NO ONE SO WE WILL MOVE ON TO THE OLD BUSINESS.
WE DO NOT HAVE ANY OLD BUSINESS THAT SENDS US CONSENT AGENDA
[CONSENT AGENDA]
THEY DID NOT REQUIRE PUBLIC HEARING THAT IS BUT BEFORE US IN SOME WAY IN THE PAST AND WE HAVE ALREADY GONE OVER THEM.ANY MEMBER OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION THAT WOULD LIKE TO
REMOVE FOR DISCUSSION? >> IF NOT I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA.
>> MOVED TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA.
>> THE MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND SECONDED.
>> INCLUDING THE MINUTES. >> AND THE MINUTES OF THE CONSENT AGENDA AS WELL. IT IS BEEN MADE AND SECONDED.
ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. >> AYE.
>> ANY OPPOSE SAY NO. THE CONSENT AGENDA IS APPROVED.
[4. PDD Amendment - Madison Park - PUBLIC HEARING RZ-2023-014]
WHICH BRINGS US INTO NEW BUSINESS WHICH ACTUALLY BEGINS WITH ITEM FOUR OF OUR AGENDA WHICH IS MADISON PARK.>> I'M GOING TO LOWER THE PODIUM HERE.
>> GOOD AFTERNOON EVERYONE. THE FIRST ITEM OF NEW BUSINESS IS THE MADISON PARK PDD, AN AMENDMENT TO THE EXISTING PDD TO ADD .3 ACRES INTO THE BOUNDARY AS WELL AS REMOVING 12000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL SPACE AND 12000 SQUARE SQUARESPACE OF OFFE SPACE. IN THE EDITION OF 15 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON DWYER ROAD. THE PDD ITSELF IS ABOUT 11 ACRES AND WITH THE EDITION OF THIS PROPERTY IT'LL BE A LITTLE OVER 12 THE PORTION THAT IS SUPPOSED TO COME INTO THE PDD IS CDD CURRENTLY THIS IS THE APPROVED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
>> THE APPROVED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN INCLUDES 37 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES LOCATED ON THIS PORTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND IN THE CENTER ARE THE TWO COMMERCIAL USES.
DOLLAR GENERAL AND THEN GRAZE AUTOMOTIVE.
THE APPROVED PLAN SHOWS THIS AREA HERE AS COMMERCIAL, ALONG WIRE AND OFFICE IN THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY.
THE FUTURE LAND USE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT IS LOW TO MEDIUM FOR THE PORTION OUTSIDE OF THE PDD. IN THE EXISTING PDD IS OBVIOUSLY PDD. THE MIXED-USE COMPONENT IS DESIGNATED FOR MIXED-USE COMMERCIAL WITH RESIDENTIAL AND OBVIOUSLY ON A MAJOR FOUR-DOOR LIKE WIRE ROAD THE POINT IS TO HAVE A COMMERCIAL USE ON THE STREET AND AS THE CITY CONTINUES TO GROW OUT THIS WAY AND FOR THEIR PAST IT IS VERY IMPORTANT TO LEAVE THE COMMERCIAL USE ON THE STREET AND DUE TO THAT STAFF
[00:05:07]
RECOMMENDS DENIAL SINCE THERE ARE INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN. I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AND THE APPLICANT IS HERE.>> IF THERE IS NO QUESTION THAT THIS TIME KATIE WE WILL ASK THE PETITIONER IF HE WOULD LIKE TO COME AND DISCUSS HIS PROPOSAL
>> STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD.
>> MICHAEL. >> T NEED AN ADDRESS OR
ANYTHING. >> WE WILL SIGN THAT.
WE HAD OUR PREDEVELOPMENT MEETINGS ON THIS PROJECT.
WE MET ALL ENGINEERING ALL WATER ALL POWER ALL SEWER AND WE ORIGINALLY, THIS IS PART OF THE PDD WITH 79 ACRES AND IT WENT ALL THE WAY BACK TO WHERE TIGER TRANSIT IN THE VACANT LAND AND VACANT CREEK. AND OVER THE YEARS THEY HAVE CHANGED THIS, MODIFIED THIS AND LITTLE DOWN BUT ORIGINALLY IT WAS COMPLETELY RESIDENTIAL. THEY WANTED MIXED-USE AND AS A CITY GROWS I UNDERSTAND THAT BUT THIS IS STILL MIXED-USE AND YOU MADISON PARK CONDOS AND COMMERCIAL PIECES IN OUR PROPERTY. WHEN WE ORIGINALLY CAME IN ON THE REDLINE PART OF THE PROPERTY WAS IN THE CITY AND IN THE PDD AND PART OF IT WAS OUT. OVER THE YEARS 40 ACRES IS BEEN TAKEN OUT AND IT GOT WHITTLED DOWN AGAIN SO I GOT DOWN TO 12 ACRES AND NOW IT WAS DOWN TO 10 ACRES WERE TRYING TO MAKE IT BACK TO 11 WHEN WE MET IN THE PREDEVELOPMENT MEETING BACK IN MARCH AND HER PREFERENCE WILL BE COMMERCIAL BUT YOU ME EVERY SINGLE BID. JUST BECAUSE IT'S MY PERSONAL OPINION OF COMMERCIAL YOU MEET THE REQUIREMENTS.
HE SAID BECAUSE PART OF IT IS IN THE PDD AND PART OF IT IS OUT, BRETT CANNOT BE HERE WITH FORESIGHT, HE IS OUT OF TOWN BUT BRETT WAS THERE AND HE TOLD BOTH OF US THAT WHAT YOU NEED TO DO IS REMOVE THE PDD BECAUSE THE REST OF THE PDD IS BOOKED OUT.
THERE'S NO REASON TO HAVE THE PDD INVOLVED ANYMORE IN THIS PROPERTY AND HE SAID THE SECOND OPTION IS TO REPLACE IT TO BRING IT IN AND REPLACE IT WITH YOUR PLAN.
THAT IS WHAT WE HAVE DONE. WE CAME IN IN APRIL AND WE ASKED YOU ALL TO REMOVE IT AND YOU DID NOT WANT TO DO THAT IT WAS A 3 .
WITH SIX PEOPLE ATTENDING. AND NOW THE OTHER OPTION THAT HE TOLD US AND UNFORTUNATELY, HE PASSED AWAY.
BUT WHAT HE TOLD US AND WHAT'S IN MY NOTES AND WHAT BRETT REMEMBERS IS THE OTHER OPTION WAS OUT INTO THE PDD BUT ONCE AGAIN THIS PDD THAT'S BEEN WHITTLED DOWN OVER TIME WAS 100% RESIDENTIAL TO BEGIN WITH. THERE IS A WHOLE HISTORY AND RIGHT UP IN THE STAFF NOTES FROM WHEN WE CAME THROUGH BEFORE THAT THE DOCUMENTS ENTIRE HISTORY OF THIS PROPERTY.
ANYWAY I ASKED THAT YOU ALL PASS IT THERE'S A LOT OF COMMERCIAL COMING OUT BUT THERE'S ABOUT A QUARTER ACRE ON THE FRONT OF THE ROAD. I DON'T THINK A QUARTER ACRE FOR COMMERCIAL WILL MAKE A DIFFERENCE WHEN THERE'S A TON OF COMMERCIAL COMING OUT AFTER BUT IT DOES AFFECT THIS PROPERTY AND HOW TO PROPERLY DEVELOP THIS 2.. IT HAS WATER CONNOISSEUR, POWER, CABLE, AND ACCESS ROAD BUT THE OTHER THING ALLISON ENGINEERING ORIGINALLY, THEY DID NOT WANT A CURB CUT FOR COMMERCIAL COMING IN AWFUL WIRE ROAD IS THERE IS A STREET CALLED HALEY LANE ON THE NORTHBOUND AND JUST TO THE SOUTH OF THE CORNER OF THE PROPERTY THERE IS A CURB CUT THERE'S NOT A SPACE FOR ANOTHER CURB CUT TO BRING COMMERCIAL WRITER. WE RESEARCH THIS AT NAUSEA AND WE TALK TO PEOPLE IN THE CITY AND THE COUNCIL MEMBERS AND WE
[00:10:03]
TALK TO ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, THIS IS A GREAT PLAN IT MEETS ALL THE NEEDS OF THE GROWING COMMUNITY AND IT'S NOT THAT MANY UNITS, 15 HOUSES WE BACKED DOWN FROM 16 AND WE WERE HERE LAST TIME FROM 16 AND WE ACCOMMODATED THE NEIGHBOR WITH THE DEEDED EASEMENT FOR ACCESS SO WERE TRYING TO BE GOOD NEIGHBORS, WE DID THAT SO WERE DOWN TO 15 HOUSES AND I WOULD REALLY, REALLY APPRECIATE YOUR SUPPORT TONIGHT.THIS TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT AND REQUEST REQUIRES PUBLIC HEARING SO I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING RIGHT NOW IF ANYONE WISHES TO ADDRESS THIS REGARDING THE ISSUE ONE WAY OR ANOTHER.
I SEE NO ONE COMING FORWARD, WE WILL CLOSE A PUBLIC HEARING.
THE STAFF HAVE ANY MORE TO SAY BEFORE WE STARTED DISCUSSION?
>> NO. >> THE REASON FOR STAFF RECOMMENDATION LOOK FUTURE LAND USE PLAN, IS THAT CORRECT.
>> THAT IS CORRECT CURRENTLY THEY MEET REQUIREMENTS AND
MIXED-USE ALLOWS RESIDENTIAL. >> IT DOES BUT THE PORTION OF THE MDP THAT IS SUPPOSED TO COME INTO THE MDP HAS A MIXED-USE COMPONENT HOWEVER, THEY ARE NOT SHOWING MIXED-USE THERE SHOWING
ALL RESIDENTIAL. >> IS A PART IS THAT THE PART
THAT SEEMS TO BE THE STICKLER? >> THIS PORTION HERE WHERE THE CURSOR IS, THAT WAS SLATED TO BE COMMERCIAL.
>> ORIGINALLY IT WAS MIXED-USE, RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL AND IN 2,752,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL WAS REMOVED FROM THE PDD AND REPLACED WITH 120 RESIDENTIAL UNITS.
AND THEN IN 2012 THAT'S WHEN 40 ACRES WAS REMOVED.
AND ALL OF THE REMAINING COMMERCIAL USES WERE LOCATED
ALONG WIRE ROAD. >> I HAVE A QUESTION YOU SAID THE LAND USE DESIGNATION IS MIXED USE, HOW WOULD YOU
CHARACTERIZE IT? >> ANY SORT OF MIXED-USE RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL OR OFFICE.
>> THIS APPEARS TO ME THAT IT IS MIXED-USE IF YOU LOOK AT THE WHOLE PDD. WHAT IS THE ISSUE?
>> THAT WE WANT TO PRESERVE THE FRONTAGE OF WIRE ROAD TUESDAY
COMMERCIAL. >> ALL ALONG THE STREET.
>> THE WIRE. >> COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL,
COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL. >> I THINK ON WIRE ROAD YOU WILL SEE A NUMBER OF THE PROPERTIES ARE TRANSITIONING SOME OF THE ONES THAT ARE CURRENTLY RESIDENTIAL ARE NOT IN THE CITY OR RECENTLY ANNEXED INTO THE CITY WITH A NUMBER OF OTHER MIXED-USE PROJECTS LIKE THIS IN THE QUARTER AND DOWN TO COX R ROAD. A LOT OF THOSE AT OUR ENCOURAGEMENT HAVE INCLUDED COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR FRONT AND SIMILAR TO THE CURRENT PDD FOR THIS PROJECT SHOWS.
>> IN MY OPINION, THE FRONT OF THIS WOULD BE NATURAL COMMERCIAL. IN THE RESIDENTIAL PIECE IN THE BACK SEEMS TO BE GOOD PLANNING BUT THAT PUTS THE WITH OF WIRE ROAD UNDER CONSIDERATION TON TONIGHT.
A COUPLE HUNDRED FEET. >> LESS THAN THAT IT'S A NARROW
[00:15:02]
PARCEL. >> THE FRONTAGE IS VALUABLE AS COMMERCIAL ENGINE OF THE RESIDENTIAL DIRECTED TO THE WEST OF THIS THAT HAS BEEN THERE QUITE SOME TIME HAS IT NOT.
>> YOU ARE TALKING. >> THAT IS IN THE COUNTY BUT IT HAS BEEN IN THAT STATE FOR QUITE SOME TIME.
>> I DID A QUICK MEASUREMENT THE FRONTAGE ON WIRE ROAD THAT
PARCEL IS ROUGHLY 100 FEET. >> I'M STRUGGLING MYSELF KNOWING THAT ANY COMMUNITY HAS ONLY A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF COMMERCIAL SITES THAT ARE TRULY COMMERCIAL SITES THE TRAFFIC COUNT HAS A ROOFTOPS THAT MAKE IT A DESIRABLE COMMERCIAL SITE AND I WOULD HESITATE BECAUSE WERE IN A HOT AREA FOR MORE RESIDENTIAL TO USE THEM I WOULD BE MUCH WERE COMFORTABLE TO KEEP IN COMMERCIAL. THAT AREA IS RAPIDLY GROWING AND GOING ANYMORE COMMERCIAL. IMAGINE IT WAS 79 ACRES OF ALL
RESIDENTIAL. >> THE COMMERCIAL TO ME NEEDS TO BE MORE UP TO THE FRONT AND COSTLY TOLD BY PEOPLE WHO WANT COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES. ANYMORE DISCUSSION DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY MORE QUESTIONS AND PREPARED TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WILL BE FIRST FOR US BUT WE CAN DO THAT.
>> I'M GOING TO PROVE RG 23 0 144 DENIAL.
>> MOVING TO APPROVE IT. >> THE RECOMMENDATION FOR
WE NEED AN EXPLANATION OF THE MOTION TO READ ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SAY AYE DID ANY OPPOSED SAY NO.
LET'S HAVE A ROLL CALL PLEASE. >> ROBYN BRIDGES.
>> IT FAILS. >> THAT'S WHY WE HAVE NINE
[5. Conditional Use - East Glenn Mixed-Use - PUBLIC HEARING CU-2023-017 ]
MEMBERS. CAN WE MOVE ON TO THE NEXT ITEMOF BUSINESS WHICH IS MIXED USE. >> WE SEEM TO BE HAVING
TECHNICAL DEFAU DIFFICULTIES. >> YOU ARE CONTROLLING IT, TRY
IT FROM THERE. >> TRY IT AGAIN.
>> I GUESS WE ARE GOOD TO GO THIS REQUEST IS FOR CONDITIONAL USE OF APPROVAL FOR COMMERCIAL ENTERTAINMENT USE AT ONE 0 27 EAST GLENN AVENUE JUST WEST OF CHERRY STREET, JUST EAST OF
[00:20:06]
CHERRY STREET. THIS PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED CR DE FOR REDEVELOPMENT EAST TO THE NORTH IS DBH ZONING DISTRICT AND ALSO TO THE SOUTH INTO THE EAST IS A ZONING DISTRICT AND ALL THREE ARE MADE UP OF SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES.TO THE WEST YOU WILL SEE IN C6 AND CRD BORDERING THE PROPERTY AND IS MADE UP AND IT WILL BE CONSIDERED NONCONFORMING.
THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR THIS PROPERTY IS MIXED USE OFFICE AND RESIDENTIAL. THE CR DE ZONING DISTRICT PROMOTES THE REDEVELOPMENT AND MIMIXED-USE CHARACTER FOR A NEIGHBORHOOD OF INTERMEDIATE RESIDENTIAL DENSITIES AND NECESSARY COMMERCIAL USES. IT'S TARGET IS AT AREAS FOR RENEWAL AND REDEVELOPMENT THAT WILL STABILIZE THE NEARBY QUARTERS TO THIS PROPERTY. THE DEVELOPMENT AS A WHOLE RECEIVED CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL IN MAY OF 2023 FOR A MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT WITH RESIDENTIAL AND OFFICE USES.
AS YOU CAN SEE BY THE SITE PLAN THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A TWO-STORY BREWERY AND EVENT SPACE CONSISTING OF 8500 SQUARE FEET THAT WILL FRONT EAST GLENN AVENUE.
THE BREWERY WILL BE LOCATED ON THE FIRST FLOOR AND OPERATE AT A LOT LOCAL SCALE MANUFACTURING LEVEL.
THE EVENT SPACE WILL BE PRIVATE AND ON THE SECOND FLOOR AND WILL BE CLOSED OFF AT THE DATES AND TIME THAT A PRIVATE EVENT IS NOT BEING HELD. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WILL HAVE A SINGLE ACCESS POINT FOR CHERRY STREET AND WITH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY THIS PROPERTY AT THE CORNER OF CHERRY STREET IN EAST GLENN IS OWNED THROUGH COMMON OWNERSHIP AND THEY WOULD BE TAKING ACCESS AND DRIVING THROUGH TO CONNECT TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THERE IS AN OUTDOOR SEATING AND DINING SPACE THAT WILL HAVE OCCASIONAL LIVE MUSIC PRESENT THAT IS LOCATED BETWEEN THE BREWERY EVENT SPACE IN THE PROPOSED RESTAURANT ON THE FAR EAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY.
BASED ON THE PROVIDED SITE PLAN ADEQUATE PARKING IS PRESENT FOR THE PROPOSED USES. THE MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENT MAY BE REDUCED FURTHER THAN THE PROVIDED SITE PLAN SHOWS CURRENTLY HOWEVER, THE AMOUNT OF PARKING PROVIDED AT THE SITE WILL REMAIN THE SAME. PLAYING STAFF WILL REVIEW THE REQUIREMENTS ON DART SOME MIDDLE.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS AND THEIR ARE A FEW CONDITIONS I WOULD LIKE TO NOTE WITH IT.
FIRST OUTDOOR MUSIC WILL BE LIMITED TO NO AMPLIFIED MUSIC AFTER 9:00 P.M. TO ENSURE THERE IS NO NUISANCE OR NEGATIVE IMPACTS AFFECTING THE SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL AREAS.
SECOND TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY IS REQUIRED FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT AND THE SUBMITTAL HAS CURRENTLY BEEN SUBMITTED AND BEING REVIEWED BY ENGINEERING. LAST A STEP THAT WILL BE PROVIDED AT THE FAR EAST POINT OF THE PROPERTY.
THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE AND IS ALSO PUT TOGETHER RENDERINGS THAT WERE NOT ABLE TO BE INCLUDED IN THE PACKET MATERIALS.
>> THE STUB ALWAYS GOING TO BE ON THE FAR EAST IT IS NOT ILLUSTRATED IN THE CURRENT SITE PLAN IN FRONT OF YOU.
>> YOU ARE PROPOSING THAT AS A CONDITION.
>> YES, THAT IS A REQUIREMENT. >> THIS CAME BEFORE US WITHOUT THE EXTRA PIECE OF PROPERTY IN THE ACCESS IS IT RIGHT AND RIGHT OUT, IS THAT WHERE THE COURTYARD.
>> AND WENT RIGHT THROUGH THE COURTYARD SPACE IT JUST DROVE RIGHT IN RIGHT OUT TO EAST GL GLENN.
AND THE LANES ARE PROPOSED ALREADY WITHOUT THE DOT.
>> THEY ARE PROPOSED AND INCLUDED IN THE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY MATERIAL SO THOSE ARE IN REVIEW AS WELL.
>> CAN I ASK A QUESTION IS THAT IT WAS REQUIRED 162 SPACES BUT
[00:25:01]
THEY ONLY HAD 157 SO THEY WERE GOING TO HAVE TO ACQUIRE ADDITIONAL FIVE PARKING SPACES SO THEY ARE NOT MEETING THE PARKING. THE SPACES WILL BE PROVIDED AT THE OFFICE USE AND ENJOINS IN THE CORNER OF CHERRY ENGLAND.>> YES THAT CORNER LOT. >> THEY COULD GET A MAXIMUM OF
SIX. >> THE GOING TO HAVE TO HAVE MORE IF THEY HAVE THE STUB OUT BECAUSE IT TAKES THREE PARKING
>> AS A COMMENT IN OUR STAFF REPORT WE WILL REVIEW THE FINAL PARKING REQUIREMENTS DURING THE DART PROCESS IN THE SQUARE FOOTAGE IS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH OTHER ITEMS ON THE SITE YOU MAY THINK THE APPLICANT WILL SHARE MORE INFORMATION LATER.
I THINK WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING NOT THAT THE RESTAURANT REQUIRES ANY CONDITIONAL USE BUT THE SQUARE FOOTAGE IS COMING DOWN REDUCING OVERALL PARKING SO BASED ON THAT IT WOULD BE ABLE TO MEET THE SINGLE PARCEL WITHOUT ANY SHARING OF THE OFFICE AREA SO THAT IS SOMETHING WE WILL REVIEW AND CONFIRM
DURING THE DOT PROCESS. >> ANY MORE QUESTIONS.
WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND IF THERE IS ANYONE THAT WISHES TO ADDRESS THIS ISSUE. BEFORE I DO THAT IS APPLICANT
HAVING MORE TO ADD TO THIS? >> GOOD EVENING DAVID I AM THE CIVIL ENGINEER FOR THE DEVELOPMENT.
I THINK WE ALSO HAVE THESE. >> TIFFANY IF YOU COULD PULL
THOSE UP AS WELL. >> THIS IS A LITTLE BIT FROM THE ONE BEFORE AND WE MADE A FEW CHANGES, WE HAVE DONE A LOT OF STUDYING AND MEETING AND WE WOULD THINK WE WOULD COME UP WITH SOMETHING REALLY EXCITING AND WERE PERSONALLY EXCITED ABOUT BEING INVOLVED IN IT AND WE HAVE FOLKS WITH ME TONIGHT THAT KNOWS A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE ARCHITECTURE AND I DO ALL
THE BORING ENGINEER STUFF. >> WE WILL HAVE A RIGHTLANE ON E SITE FROM CHERRY. , YOU CAN SEE WHERE AND POINTING, THIS IS AN OFFICE BUILDING DOWN WE HAVE A PROPERTY LINE HERE AND WE SUBMITTED A CONSOLIDATION PLAN TODAY TO CONSOLIDATE ALL OF THIS NOW THAT IT'S ALL ONE OWNER.
I'M NOT SURE WHAT THAT IS AS FAR AS SHARED PARKING IS IT SHARED PARKING ARRANGEMENT STILL REQUIRED.
>> WITH THE REDUCED FOOTPRINT OF THE RESTAURANT AREA HE WOULD STILL BE ABLE TO BE ALL THE PARKING THERE.
>> SHARED REQUIREMENT WOULD NOT NECESSARILY BE THERE BASED ON
THE SQUARE FOOTAGE IS. >> OKAY.
>> AFTER A LOT OF MEETINGS ABOUT OF DISCUSSION I FEEL LIKE WITH WORKED OUT ALL THE DETAILS WE CAN UNTIL WE GET INTO DESIGN DRAWING IN TRT AND THINGS LIKE THAT.
>> WAS YOUR STUB OUT. >> WERE NOT SHOWING THE STUB OUT ON THIS DRAWING BUT WE DON'T HAVE AN ISSUE AND IT WOULD NOT OCCUPY WHERE THE SPACES ARE. IT WOULD BE ALIGNED IT WOULD ESPECIALLY BE AN EXTENSION. IT WOULD NOT AFFECT THE PARKING SPACES. LIKE YOU SAID THIS WOULD BE A
[00:30:02]
PIZZA RESTAURANT AND IS GOING TO HAVE A LOT OF GAS TO BE INCORPORATED WITH OUTDOOR SP SPACES.WE HAVE A COUPLE OF FOOD TRUCK SPOTS HERE IN THE BUILDING WITH SOME GREEN SPACE AND SO FORTH SCATTERED THROUGHOUT THEIR.
I WILL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY ENGINEERING RELATED QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE ANYTHING RELATED TO ARCHITECTURE OR OPERATION OF THE BUSINESS WE HAVE FOLKS HERE TONIGHT THAT CAN ANSWER THAT MUCH BETTER THAN I CAN. I THINK THERE IS MORE INFORMATION THAT THEY ARE WILLING TO SHARE.
>> DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY MORE INFORMATION THEY WOULD LIKE TO
SHARE. >> I THINK THE WHOLE FOCAL POINT IS UNIQUE THERE IS NOT REALLY A SPACE THAT HAS AN OUTDOOR VENUE LIKE THIS IN THE WAY THE PROJECT WORKS IS BACK IN FRONT GOING TO GENERATE A RETAINING WALL IN ANY ENVIRONMENT AND BOCCE COURT, SHUFFLEBOARD COURT, ALL OUTDOOR SEATING, WE WANT TO DO AN ARTIFICIAL TURF FOR THE GREEN SPACES I DON'T KNOW IF ANYBODY'S EVER BEEN TO THE COASTAL DONE ORANGE BEACH BUT HAS A SIMILAR FEEL TO THAT, FIRE PIT, PERGOLA. FROM AN ARCHITECTURAL STANDPOINT THE IDEA OF BRINGING SOMETHING UNIQUE TO OFFER IS NOT REALLY A WAREHOUSE DISTRICT IN AUBURN SO THE THOUGHT PROCESS, DO SOMETHING A LITTLE DIFFERENT. A LOT OF PLACES HAVE WAREHOUSES WE CAME UP WITH THE CONCEPT OF WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS IN THE EARLY 1900S WITH THE MODERN INDUSTRIAL SKILL SO I THINK IT BE PRETTY COOL. YOU HAVE ANY MORE QUESTIONS? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. LET ME MAKE SURE I'M CLEAR HERE KEVIN BASICALLY WHAT IS BEFORE US IS A CONDITIONAL USE.
>> CORRECT. >> JUST THE BREWERY AND EVENT SPACE, THE RESTAURANT THE MULTI-FAMILY HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY APPROVED WHETHER OR NOT THIS IS AN APPROPRIATE SITE, COMPATIBLE SITE OR A BREWERY AS DESCRIBED, I WILL OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING DOES ANYONE WISH TO ADDRESS THAT? MOVING FORWARD WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND CONTINUE ANY DISCUSSION OR COMMENTS FROM THE COMMISSION.
I HAVE A COUPLE OF COMMENTS. I HAVE A COUPLE OF COMMENTS.
IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE DEVELOPER MAY WANT TO ANSWER THIS OR TO EXPLAIN A LITTLE BIT MORE, THE RESTAURANT AND THE BREWERY I KNOW WERE NOT TALKING ABOUT THE RESTAURANT BUT THEY WILL BOTH SHARE THE OUTSIDE PATIO.
>> I'M TRYING TO CREATE AN ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT THAT WILL FIT IN AROUND THE BREWERY IN THE RESTAURANT I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S IN THE PACKET IT'S CORVALLIS, THEY HAVE FIVE LOCATIONS IN GEORGIA AND THE TREND TO MOVE INTO ALABAMA SO THAT WILL BE THERE AND WILDLY HAS THREE LOCATIONS IN THE IDEA THAT THEY WILL SHARE THE SPACE WE WANT TO DO THE ROLLUP DOORS IN THE GARAGE DOORS AND THEY CAN OPEN THE DOORS AND LET PEOPLE MIGRATE AROUND OUT THERE AND THIS WILL BE OPEN OUTSIDE PATIO WITH LIVE
MUSIC UNTIL 9:00 O'CLOCK. >> I WOULD NOT SAY ON THE DAILY IT WOULD BE OPEN AT 9:00 9:00 O'CLOCK.
THERE COULD BE OPEN FIVE D SEVEN DAYS A WEEK.
>> I WOULD IMAGINE SEVEN DAYS A WEEK.
THEY ARE HERE TONIGHT IF YOU HAVE ANY SPECIFIC QUESTIONS FOR THE BREWERY. I DON'T KNOW IF ANYBODY'S BEEN TO WILDLY BUT AS A FAMILY, FRIENDLY ENVIRONMENT, NO INTENTIONS OF TURNING THIS INTO A SKY BAR OR ANYTHING REMOTELY CLOSE TO THAT. OUR GOAL IS TO MAKE THIS MORE OF A FAMILY-FRIENDLY A LARGER RESIDENTIAL AREA ON THAT SIDE OF
[00:35:04]
TOWN TO CONVENIENT SITE WHERE PEOPLE DON'T HAVE TO GO ALL THE WAY INTO DOWNTOWN TO EAT IT WOULD BE A COOL THING.>> MORE QUESTIONS. >> COMMENTS, YOU JUST HAVE ONE.
>> IS OUTSIDE MUSIC IN THE PIPED OUT MUSIC EVEN WHEN THE AMPLIFIED MUSIC IS NOT OUT THERE AFTER NINE IN THE RESIDENTIAL
AREA SURROUNDING IT. >> WE PUT TOGETHER A BIG BLOW TO. , YOU'RE ON THE FOREFRONT SIDE 25000 HOLIDAY ROAD AND YOU HAVE TRAFFIC NOISE CONSTANTLY THERE.
HAVE YOU EVER BEEN TO THE VENUES IT WOULD BE MOSTLY ACOUSTIC AND THINGS LIKE THAT IN ANY MUSIC SOUNDS OF THE GOING TO MAKE.
>> ANYTHING ELSE? >> I MOVED APPROVED CONDITIONAL
>> THE MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND SECONDED.
NOW IT'S RECOMMENDED APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS.
>> WITH CONDITIONS. >> SECOND.
>> ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SAY AYE.
>> AYE. >> ANY OPPOSED SAY NO.
[6. Conditional Use - Webster Road Warehouse - PUBLIC HEARING CU-2023-033]
>> WE ARE READY FOR THE WEBSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE.
>> THIS IS APPROVAL FOR COMMERCIAL SUPPORT YOU SPECIFICALLY A WAREHOUSE DISTRIBUTION FACILITY THAT WILL BE LOCATED AT 300 WEBSTER ROAD IN THE INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT. THE IMMEDIATE PROPERTY IN THE AREA SOUTH OF HIGHWAY 14 IS INDUSTRIAL THERE IS AN EXISTING MOBILE HOME PARK TO THE SOUTH OR THE EAST AND THERE IS A SLIVER ALSO ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THIS IS THE SITE PLAN THAT WAS INCLUDED IN YOUR PACKET AND HERE I HAVE ENLARGED THE OVERALL SITE THE OVERALL SITE IS APPROXIMATELY 41 ACRES IT WILL NEED TO BE SUBDIVIDED TO CREATE THE DEVELOPMENT SITE THAT WILL BE ABOUT 17 ACRES IN THE INITIAL DEVELOPMENT WILL BE 100,000 SQUARE-FOOT DISTRIBUTION FACILITY WITH 12 LOADING DOCKS.
IN THE REQUEST ALSO INCLUDES AN AREA FOR EXPANSION, 50000 SQUARE FEET HERE WITH AN AREA FOR EIGHT ADDITIONAL LOADING DOCKS.
THERE WILL BE THE CURRENT CURB CUT AT MCMILLAN THAT WILL BE CLOSED INTO NEW CURB CUTS WILL BE CREATED.
THE USE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT AND THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF INDUSTRIAL AND STAFF
RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. >> THIS IS A PRIVATE DISTRIBUTION CENTER IS SUPPORTED INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY.
>> DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO MAKE ANY COMMENT.
>> I AM HERE ON BEHALF IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
>> IF NOT WE WILL OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING AND SEE IF THERE'S ANYONE HERE WHO WISHES TO COMMENT ABOUT THE PROJECT.
>> YES OR. >> MY NAME IS RANDY JOHNSON NOBODY LIVES ON INDUSTRY PARK BUT I WORK ACROSS THE STREET AT 400 WEBSTER ROAD. I CANNOT TELL FROM THE SITE PLAN THAT YOU HAVE HERE BUT I DO HAVE SOME QUESTIONS AND WHAT MY BIGGEST CONCERNS WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO THE AMOUNT OF LARGE TRUCK TRAFFIC COMING OUT OF MCMILLAN.
THERE'S ALREADY A LOT OF THAT. BUT ALSO HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT THE POND WHAT WILL THIS DO TO THE POND ON THE PIECE OF
[00:40:03]
PROPERTY. >> WE WILL GET THE ANSWER FOR
YOU. >> THE ONE CONCERN IS WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN WITH THE TRAFFIC AND A LOT OF UTILITIES AND HIGH-POWERED LINES COMING ACROSS THEIR AND I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE CONSTRUCTION WILL DUE TO THE POWER THERE WHICH IS REMEDIED PRETTY WELL, I WONDER IF THIS WILL DISRUPT THAT AGAIN.
>> WE WILL GET THE QUESTIONS ANSWERED AS SOON AS THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED, ANYONE ELSE. THERE'S NO ONE ELSE I CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING IN THE TWO QUESTIONS I SAW WHAT IS GOING HAPPEN WITH THE POND ON THE SITE DID THEY LEAVE.
NO HE'S BACK OUT HERE. >> I GUESS IT IS MY TURN.
>> IT IS YOUR TURN. >> NOT QUITE THE STATURE.
HOPEFULLY YOU GUYS WILL BE OKAY WITH IT FOR THE NIGHT.
SHANE YARBOROUGH. ACCORDING TO BRETT THERE WILL BE NO CHANGE THE POND SHALL REMAIN AS IT IS AS IT RELATES TO TRAFFIC THIS IS A WAREHOUSE AND I BELIEVE IT'S BEEN USED AS A FULFILLMENT CENTER IN THE WAREHOUSE FUNCTION.
IT'S NOT A QUICK TURNOVER IT'S A FULFILLMENT FACILITY I'M SURE FROM A TRAFFIC PERSPECTIVE THESE ITEMS WILL BE LOOKED AT AND TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION. I DO KNOW FROM A STANDPOINT THERE IS A DISTINCTION A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A FULFILLMENT THAT HAS A QUICK TURNOVER AND A LOT OF TRAFFIC VERSUS A WAREHOUSE FACILITY WHICH IS A STORAGE TYPE FACILITY.
>> WHAT ABOUT THE POTENTIAL POWER INTERRUPTIONS ANYTHING ON
THAT. >> I'M NOT AWARE OF ANY POWER INTERRUPTIONS I WILL SAY ONE OTHER COMMENT THE TRUCKS WILL BE ABLE TO USE IT IN MCMILLAN NEW DRIVE SO ONE COMMENT THAT RHETT MADE ABOUT THE TRAFFIC THAT IS DEFINITELY BEING LOOKED AT AND WILL BE ADDRESSED AS IT RELATES TO POWER I'M NOT SURE IF THEY'RE CONCERNED WITH ANY UTILITY OUTAGES OR POWER OUTAGES AS IT RELATES TO THIS FACILITY. EATING MORE QUESTIONS.
>> IS ANY MORE QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS.
>> MOVED APPROVED K SEE YOU 2021 WEBSTER ROAD WAREHOUSE.
>> IS BEEN MADE AND SECONDED. ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SAY AYE PRETTY OPPOSED, SAY NO. THE MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
[7. Preliminary Plat - Mimms Trail 13th Addition - PUBLIC HEARING PP-2023-022]
THE NEXT ITEM THE TRAIL SUBDIVISION 13TH EDITION.>> THIS IS A REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR THE 56 PERFORMANCE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, IT IS LOCATED WITHIN THE TRAIL PDD THE SOUTHERN MOST PORTION JUST SOUTH OF THE CURRENT TRAIL. THE DEVELOPMENT SITE IS JUST OVER 17 ACRES AND INCLUDES 50 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED LOTS, THREE OPEN SPACE LOTS, HERE IS ONE, HERE IS ANOTHER IN A LARGER ONE HERE, TWO OUTLETS ONE HERE TO ACCESS THE LIFT STATION AND ANOTHER SMALLER OUTLET FOR STORM PIPE DISCHARGE AND THERE IS AN AREA FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT THE PLOT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION REGULATION AND STAFF RECOMMEND APPROVAL.
>> AND CHANDA UNDERSTAND ACCESS TO THIS PROPERTY I CAN'T QUITE
SEE. >> THERE IS A PHASE HERE, 11B THEY CHANGED IT TO A IS 12 SO THERE WILL BE A SINGLE ACCESS.
>> ALSO BRENTWOOD WILL COME DOWN AND AROUND.
[00:45:02]
>> WILL THAT ACCESS THE PROPERTY INCOME TO THE PROPERTY.
>> OKAY I DON'T SEE A REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE DEVELOPER HERE. YOU ARE THE REPRESENTATIVE.
>> I WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
NO PUBLIC HERE, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> MOVED TO APPROVE PP 202322 SUBDIVISION 13TH EDITION.
>> SECOND. >> THE MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND SECOND FOR APPROVAL. ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION SAY
[8. Preliminary Plat - Herman Alexander Subdivision Phase 2 - PUBLIC HEARING PP-2023-023]
I, ANY OPPOSED SAY NO, THE MOTION CARRIES.THE NEXT ITEM OF BUSINESS IS HERMAN ALEXANDER SUBDIVISION I SUPPOSE. PHASE TWO.
>> THIS REQUEST IS FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR A FIVE LOT SINGLE-FAMILY CONVENTIONAL SUBDIVISION OF 22.F BUD BLOCH ROAD. THE PROPERTY IS ZONED RURAL AND SURROUNDED ON ALL SIDES BY THE PROPERTY THAT IS IN THE RURAL ZONING DESIGNATION. THE FIRST PHASE OF THE HERMAN ALEXANDER SUBDIVISION SUBDIVIDED BOX ONE THROUGH THREE AND ADMIN PLAT SUBDIVISION AND WAS RECORDED IN OCTOBER OF 2022.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL WITH COMMENTS.
>> ARE THERE ANY STRUCTURES ON ANY OF THESE PROPERTIES YET.
>> NOT THAT I KNOW WHAT. I THINK A STRUCTURE IS IN THE WORKS TO BE ERECTED ON LOT TO A PHASE ONE BUT NOTHING ON THE FX.
>> ANY REPRESENTED OF THE PETITIONER HERE, IF NOT IT REQUIRES THE PUBLIC HEARING, THAT THE RECORDS SHOW THAT WE OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THERE IS NO RESPONSE SO WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION,
YOU A QUESTION AND ANSWER. >> MY APPROVAL IS NOT CONTENTION
>> I MOVED APPROVED 2023 0 23. >> SECOND.
>> LOUVER APPROVE AND SECOND, ANY OPPOSED SAY NO, THE MOTION
[9. Final Plat - Herman Alexander Subdivision Phase 2 FP-2023-020]
CARRIES. THE NEXT ONE IS THE FINAL PLAT FOR THE SAME SUBDIVISION. UNLESS YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD.IT DOESN'T REQUIRE PUBLIC HEARING.
IT'S A SIMPLE SUBDIVISION. I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH CONSIDERING THE FINAL PLAN ON THE SAME EVENING.
>> MOVED TO APPROVE FP TWO 0 23 0 TWO 0 HERMAN ALEXANDER PHASE
TWO. >> THE MOTION IS MADE AND SECONDED ALL IN FAVOR, SAY AYE PRETTY OPPOSED, SAY NO, THE MOTION CARRIES. I DO BELIEVE THAT IS IN THE
[STAFF COMMUNICATION ]
LIST. THE CHAIRMAN HAS NOCOMMUNICATION STAFF? >> NOCA MITIGATION.
>> THIS IS YOUR FINAL MEETING. >> I'LL BE BACK.
>> HE WILL BE ON BOARD AS OF MONDAY.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.