[00:00:09]
>> CALLING THE MEETING TO ORDER AT 4:30 ON FEBRUARY 5TH, 2005. I JUST WANT THE RECORD TO SHOW THAT I AM LATICIA SMITH AND I AM SERVING IN ABSENCE OF THE CHAIR .
[APPROVAL OF MINUTES]
MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM THE LAST MEETING?[CHAIRMAN’S OPENING REMARKS]
OH, I'M S■ORRY. >> OKAY. ALL RIGHT. OPENING REMARKS BY THE CHAIRMAN? ANY PERSONS AGGRIEVED BY ANY DECISION OF THE BOARD MAY WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER SUCH DECISION APPEALED TO THE CIRCUIT COURT HAVING JURISDICTION ACCORDING TO SECTION 908.02 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, ALABAMA. IT CONSISTS OF FIVE MEMBERS AND TWO SUPERNUMERARY'S.
THEY WILL ONLY VOTE TO ASSIST THE FOUR BOARD MEMBERS, HAVING A BOARD CONSISTING OF FIVE MEMBERS WHEN POSSIBLE. ALL DECISIONS ARE MADE WITH A ROLL CALL VOTE. FOUR MEMBERS IS REQUIRED TO APPROVE ALL APPLICATIONS FOR A VARIANCE.
>> WE DON'T HAVE A SUPERNUMERARY VOTING THANK YOU.
>> CALLED ] >> OKAY, WE WILL GET STARTED.
[1. Variance to Table 4-3: Standards for Nonresidential Uses by District, in the City of Auburn Zoning Ordinance BZ-2025-011]
OUR NEW WE HAVE BZ 2025-011.>> THIS REQUEST, SEEKING A -- WITH REQUIREMENT FOR THE SERVICE USE IN THE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO LOT WITH.
SPECIFICALLY -- TABLE 4-3, NONRESIDENTIAL USES BY DISTRICT.
I LISTED OUT ALL OF THE TYPES FOUND IN OUR ORDINANCE. THEY WERE HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW. AGAIN, THIS A PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CD ZONE . YOU CAN'T SEE IT VERY WELL, BUT TO THE LEFT IS AUBURN HIGH SCHOOL. THAT'S IN THE CORNER.
>> THAT IS AN UNUSUALLY SHAPED PIECE OF PROPERTY.
>> BELIEVE THE CURRENT CONFIGURATION. BACK IN 2015, THE MOST UP-TO-DATE SUBDIVISION. SO THIS CONFIGURATION, I GUESS IS ABOUT 10 YEARS OLD. THE OFFICE, KIND OF TYPE USES. AND CURRENTLY 75 1/2 FEET ARE SEEKING TO BUILD A ROAD SERVICE USE IN THIS AREA. MUCH OF THE IS AVAILABLE TO DETENTION PODS AND EASEMENTS. AND LIKE I SAID, THE TABLE KIND OF LIST OUT OF THE USES ALLOWED. AND ARE SEVERAL USES REQUIRED, OR AT 75 FEET. I'M NOT EXACTLY SURE. WE COULDN'T FIND EXACTLY WHY ROAD SERVICE WAS AT 100 FEET. WE BELIEVE IT WAS JUST TOO PROPER SPACING OF SEVERAL ROAD USES AT ONCE, OR FOR, YOU KNOW, PROPER SPACE FOR THESE PATTERNS, THINGS LIKE THAT. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
[00:05:03]
>> THAT MY QUESTION. WHY DO WE HAVE SOME INSTITUTIONAL? LIKE, WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN INSTITUTIONAL
AND ROAD SERVICE, I GUESS? >> YEAH, SO IN ORDINANCE, THERE ARE SEVERAL LISTED USES. IT COULD BE A FAST FOOD RESTAURANT,
ATM DRIVE THROUGH. >> ANYTHING WHERE YOU WILL HAVE COMING AND GOING AT THE SAME TIME ROUGHLY IS WHAT WE ARE
TALKING ABOUT? >> CORRECT, CORRECT. NOT
NECESSARILY RETAIL FOCUSED. >> OKAY. I'M CURIOUS WHY THERE ARE ONLY TWO THAT DELINEATE. I WAS JUST WONDERING IF THAT WAS MORE LIKE SERVICE ROAD THAT MIGHT HAVE LARGE VEHICLE WAS LIKE DUMP TRUCKS, 18 WHEELERS, THINGS LIKE THAT TOO. I JUST DON'T KNOW THE REASONING BEHIND IT. BY ONLY TWO DELINEATE 100
FEET, AND OTHERS DELINEATE 75. >> WE DIDN'T HAVE A CONCRETE REASON. BUT IT HAS BEEN IN PLACE PRIOR TO 2015 WHEN IT WAS
>> IS THE APPLICANT HERE? PLEASE MAKE SURE YOU SIGN THE LAW, IF YOU HAVEN'T ALREADY DONE SO.
>> GOOD AFTERNOON. >> GOOD AFTERNOON. I AM REPRESENTING THE DEVELOPER. SO YES, MY QUESTION THIS AFTERNOON TO JUSTICE WAS THE SAME AS YOURS. WAS THE REASON FOR THE 100 FEET? AND WHATEVER I WAS GETTING AT. WHATEVER THAT INTENT IS. DOES IT STILL MEET THAT INTENT? SO WE STILL DON'T KNOW.
MAYBE THAT'S SOMETHING THEY CAN LOOK AT.
>> I'M SORRY TO TAKE AWAY FROM YOUR TIME.
>> AS FAR AS THIS GOES, WE ARE SEEKING ADDITIONAL APPROVAL NEXT WEEK AT THE PLANNING COMMISSION. AND I PERSONALLY FEEL LIKE IT'S A GREAT LOCATION FOR THIS. THEY ARE CURRENTLY IN TOWN. HOPEFULLY THEY ARE AT A PLACE WHERE THEIR CUSTOMERS CAN PARK THEIR VEHICLES. WE WORKED HARD TO COME UP WITH A PLAN THAT WORKS IN A LOT OF LOCATIONS WHERE MISUSE WOULD BE FROWNED UPON BY STAFF BECAUSE OF THE PARKING. AND TO ME, THAT IS WHAT MAKES THIS DESIRABLE. IT IS BEHIND TWO OTHER BUSINESSES. THERE ARE UTILITIES IN PLACE, A DETENTION POND ALREADY THERE, RIGHT AND LEFT TURNING LANES. THAT POINT TOWARD IT BEING A GREAT LOCATION FOR THIS USE. I UNDERSTAND FROM THE STAFF POINT OF VIEW WHY THEY SAID NO HARDSHIP. FROM THE CITY POINT OF VIEW, THERE IS NO HARDSHIP. AND I GUESS THAT IS REALLY WHAT THIS COMES DOWN TO.
IF THEY DON'T GET THE VARIANCE, THEY WILL HAVE TO GO BUILD SOMEWHERE ELSE. LIKE I SAID, THE APPLICANT, IT IS CERTAINLY A HARDSHIP. THIS IS WHERE THEY'VE CHOSEN TO HAVE A CONTRACT. IS DEFINITELY A HARDSHIP THAT CAN'T BE CHANGED. THIS IS IN ORDER TO REPLANT. AND WE CAN'T JUST FORCE OTHER PEOPLE TO SELL PROPERTY. I FEEL THE HARDSHIP IS JUSTIFIED IN THESE LOCATIONS. WE WOULD APPRECIATE YOUR CONSIDERATION AND I WOULD BE
GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >> JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, YOU
[00:10:06]
ARE SAYING THAT WITHOUT THIS VARIANCE, THAT THE APPLICANT WILL NOT BE ABLE TO MAKE THIS HAPPEN.>> BECAUSE IT IS CONSIDERED ROAD SERVICE, THIS IS THE ONLY WAY TO OVERCOME THAT OBSTACLE. IF IT FAILS TONIGHT, WE WILL JUST PULL THE ITEM. ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NEXT WEEK.
>> OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? >> NO, NOT RIGHT NOW.
>> OKAY. WELL I DO HAVE A QUESTION. I KNOW YOU ARE JUST THE CIVIL ENGINE OR -- ENGINEER -- DO WE HAVE A PLAN TO SHOW WHERE THE FACILITY AND PARKING WOULD BE? COULD ANYTHING BE DONE TO REDUCE THE SIZE? IT IS REALLY JUST -- IT DOESN'T HAVE
ANYTHING TO DO WITH IT. >> IT'S ON FILE.
>> YES, SO THE PARKING, THE MAJORITY OF THE SITES IMPACTED
>> WE ONLY HAVE 75 FEET. >> IT'S A DRIVEWAY. THAT'S
ESSENTIALLY WHAT IT IS. >> WE PLOTTED ANYWAY JUST LIKE
PROFESSIONALS. >> SIPHONING OFF SOME OF YOUR POSSIBILITIES. AS A RECENT WAIVER JUST TO FOLLOW, THE TOTAL THEY HAD WAS LIKE 260. THE MINIMUM THEY NEED IT FOR A LOT WAS 50. 260 DIVIDED BY 50, SOMEHOW THEY ONLY GOT FOUR, THEN THEY NEEDED A WAIVER. THAT'S SOMETHING THAT THEY DIDN'T CALL, THEY DIDN'T TALK ABOUT IT, AND THEY DID IT INCORRECTLY. IF YOU ARE TRYING TO SELL, AND YOU DON'T WANT TO INCLUDE WHO YOUR BUYERS POTENTIALLY COULD BE BY SUBDIVIDING IT, ONLY GIVING IT 75 FEET, THAT'S WHAT THEY DID. WHAT THEY DID, THIS NUMBER FOR 100 WOULD BE LAND-USE, JUST KIND OF ASSOCIATED WITH ROAD SERVICE USES, JUST WHAT THEY ARE NEXT TO. LIKE I SAID, I THINK THIS ONE IS WHAT WE ARE LOOKING AT. THIS IS NOT LIKE THE REST OF THE LAW. A LOT OF WHAT THEY ARE GOING FOR AND WHAT THEY WILL BE DOING. AS IN I GUESS WHAT WOULD BE THE FLAG, THE RIGHT PORTION OF THE LOT. SO WHERE EVERYTHING IS CITED REALLY ISN'T BACKED BY ANY OF THIS. THIS IS THE STEM AT THE TOP. THERE IS ALSO A TURN LANE UP THERE, TOO. WE TALKED TO ENGINEERING. IT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT IS DERIVED FROM THEM. BUT I DO THINK THIS HAS TO DO WITH THE APPLICATION, WHERE THEY WOULD GO. JUST BECAUSE WE HAVE PERFORMANCE ZONING. THERE ARE A NUMBER OF USES YOU CAN PUT ALL OVER THE PLACE WITH NCDD AND THAT ARE ABLE TO COEXIST THE APPLICATIONS. I WOULD SAY THAT'S PROBABLY THE MAIN POINT, EVERYTHING LIKE THE OFFICE, THE
PARKING LOT. >> SO IS JUST AN IN AND OUT
>> THIS SPEAKS TO THE INTENSITY, VERY CLEARLY IN THE ZONING
ORDINANCE. >> I FEEL MY OPINION WOULD BE, THIS IS NOT A FAST FOOD RESIDENT -- RESTAURANT. I'VE USED SERVICES BEFORE, IT'S NOT IN AND OUT ALL DAY LONG 20 SEVEN LIKE A GAS STATION, RESTAURANT OR ANYTHING. OR IS IT SOMETHING
ELSE THAT WOULD BE? >> THIS IS ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WOULD COME UP. I DON'T THINK WE HAVE SOLID NUMBERS OF WHAT IT WOULD BE. HOW MANY CARS WOULD BE COMING AND GOING. THAT
[00:15:09]
WAS SOMETHING THAT WE DID ASK, SOMETHING WE WILL GET TO THE BOTTOM OF. THEY WEREN'T ABLE TO PROVIDE US AN ESTIMATE. IT WAS SOMETHING THAT WE DID ASK FOR, AND THEY DID THEY WOULD GET BACK TO US. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY. THANK YOU.>> STAFF, DO WE RECEIVE ANY COMMUNICATION ON THIS?
>> YOU NEED TO OPEN IT FOR PUBLIC HEARING.
>> THIS IS OPEN NOW FOR PUBLIC HEARING.
>> YES PLEASE, THANK YOU. >> THE Y'ALL KNOW EXACTLY WHERE
SPEAKERS ] >> IT'S LIKE I HAVE I BLINDNESS TO THAT. I CAN'T PLACE EXACTLY WHERE IT IS.
>> YEAH. KIND OF LIKE WAS STATED, IT IS KIND OF A DISCRETE AREA. YOU WOULDN'T KNOW IT WAS THERE.
>> MY NAME IS STACY, I OWN THE PROPERTY ADJACENT. AND PREVIOUSLY, I OWNED ALL OF THIS. ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE WITH THE PARCEL. I PURCHASED THE ORIGINAL PIECE IN 2010. WITH THE INTENTION TO KEEP OUT ANY ROAD SERVICE, HIGH TRAFFIC, HIGH DENSITY. THAT WAS AN INTENTIONAL PLATTING SO THAT WE WOULDN'T HAVE THE ROAD SERVICE. THEY MAY NOT NEED 100 FEET. THE CITY REQUIRES THAT FOR THE ROAD SERVICE. THE REASON IS SUCH A FOLKY SHAPED LOT, I REPLY TO THIS SEVERAL TIMES AND ADDED PART OF THE LOT TO THE BACK PIECE OF THE CURRENT OFFICE BUILDING, BUT I WAS NICE ENOUGH TO GIVE THE POD FOR WHOEVER FOCUSED -- SO I'M NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DETENTION POND. IT WAS A LOT OF FORESIGHT THAT WENT INTO PLANNING THE PROPERTY THE WAY IT IS. I HAVE SOME NOTES.
>> OKAY, TAKE YOUR TIME. >> TO ME, THIS WOULD BE A HARDSHIP ON MY BUSINESS. THERE IS ONE DRIVEWAY THAT WOULD SERVICE NOW ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR, FIVE POTENTIAL BUSINESSES.
WE ARE SANDWICHED BETWEEN THE HIGH SCHOOL AND THE CHURCH OF VIOLENCE. THAT ROADWAY, CERTAIN TIMES OF THE DAY IS BACKED UP ALL THE WAY. ALL OF THESE TRAFFIC LIGHTS ARE JUST CLUSTERED. YOU CANNOT TURN LEFT OUT OF OUR DRIVEWAY, OR TURN LEFT INTO THE DRIVEWAY. IT'S NOT JUST FOR SHUTTLING BUSES AND VANS. WHO'S TO SAY THEY AREN'T GOING TO CHANGE AND THEY AREN'T GOING TO INCLUDE -- I MEAN, NOBODY CAN PREDICT WHAT THEIR BUSINESS MODEL MAY BE IN THE FUTURE. AND THAT CAN CHANGE THAT TO MORE LOCAL INSTEAD OF GOING TO THE AIRPORTS, COLUMBUS AND MONTGOMERY, THEY CAN USE THOSE SHUTTLE BUSES FOR MORE LOCAL SHUTTLING. IT HAS A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON OUR BUSINESS.
CUSTOMERS AND CLIENT, THE LAW FIRM, THE REAL ESTATE OFFICE THE MORTGAGE COMPANY, EVERYBODY THAT IS ALREADY IN THAT SPACE GETTING IN AND OUT OF THAT PROPERTY ARE YOU --
>> I'M SORRY. YOUR THREE MINUTES WAS UP.
[00:20:05]
>> OH, I'M SORRY. >> DID YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY
AT THE END WITH >> IF YOU DON'T MIND, THE HARDSHIP AS YOU GUYS SAID IS REALLY A HARDSHIP THAT COULD FIND ANOTHER PIECE OF PROPERTY TO CONDUCT THE SAME BUSINESS. I
GUESS I WILL LET IT GO THERE. >> ANY QUESTIONS?
>> NO OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS, WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. WE WILL OPEN IT UP NOW FOR BOARD DISCUSSION.
OKAY. THOUGHTS? >> NOW WE HAVE THE INFORMATION ABOUT WHY THE LOT WAS IT THE WAY IT WAS. OKAY. CAN YOU ELABORATE AGAIN ON THE BUFFER LANES? THE D CELL AND X CELL LANES.
>> SURE. THE BUSINESSES THERE THAT ACCOMMODATE THIS. THIS IS KIND OF THE DEFINITION OF ALL OF THIS STUFF . LOT WIDTH IS MEASURED, SO THEY HAVE TWO DEFINITIONS. IT'S ACTUALLY A LOT WITH THE BOUNDARY LINE. ALSO WHAT IS MEASURED, WHICH IS JUST THE ROAD FOOTAGE. THE BUFFER YARDS WITHIN THE PERFORMANCE ZONING MEANS THAT A MULTITUDE OF DIFFERENT USES KENDALL RIGHT NEXT TO EACH OTHER. SO KIND OF LIKE AROUND THE CORNER FROM HERE. THERE'S ANOTHER HOUSE IN FRONT OF IT. AND THERE'S ANOTHER THAT IS KIND OF LIKE A WAREHOUSE. THE ONLY THING THAT KEEPS THEM SEPARATED IS THE BUFFER YARDS. BUFFER YARDS ARE DETERMINED BY THE LAND-USE AND IN CITY. SO THESE NORMALLY ARE THE MOST INTENSE JUST FROM THE LEVEL OF TRAFFIC. SO WHETHER THAT BE DRIVE-THROUGH, A FAST FOOD DRIVE THROUGH. IT'S KIND OF TO THE POINT WITH WHAT THEIR BUSINESS MODEL IS. THIS KIND OF UNPRECEDENTED -- THEY'VE DONE THIS IN OTHER LOCATIONS. THEY'VE GOT TO BE OFFERING THE ABILITY TO PARK THERE. THAT'S SOMETHING FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO KIND OF WAY OUT. HOW MANY PEOPLE DO YOU EXPECT? HOW MANY DO YOU EXPECT TO BE PARKING, YOUR BUSES, ALL OF THESE OTHER THINGS. WHERE THEY WILL AND WILL BE MAINTAINING. THEY ARE RELEVANT FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION. THAT HAS TO DO WITH BUFFER YARDS BEING NECESSARY FOR PERFORMANCE TO BE EXECUTED IN THEORY.
>> OKAY, THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS?
>> COMMENTS, NOT QUESTIONS. I SEE LOTS OF GOOD WITH THEM BEING HERE OVERALL. BUT I ALSO SEE LOTS OF ISSUES WITH LAND-USE, PROPOSALS, THINGS THAT HAD TO CHANGE FOR THIS TO HAPPEN. THAT BEING SAID, SINCE THERE ARE OTHER -- TOWARD THE LAND, I DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS THE BEST USE OF THE LAND OVERALL. BUT, THAT BEING THERE WOULD BE A POSITIVE THING. I CAN SEE WHY
THEY WOULD WANT IT THERE. >> IT ANNOYS ME TO NO END THAT I HAVE TO WAIT ON MY HUSBAND TO PICK ME UP AND DROP ME OFF.
UNFORTUNATELY, OUR HANDS ARE TIED. WE DON'T MAKE THE RULES.
I WOULD REALLY LIKE TO SEE PLANNING, OR THE POWERS THAT BE.
MAYBE TO LOOK AT THIS ROAD SERVICE AND AGRICULTURAL SUPPORT. AND WHY THEY ARE THE ONLY TWO. THE ROAD SERVICE IS A LITTLE CONFUSING FOR ME. THE OTHER THINGS THAT ARE THERE, I'M ASSUMING EVERYBODY ELSE HAS THAT. LIKE, DOES SHELLEY HAVE
THAT? >> YEAH. SO THOSE AREN'T ROAD
SERVICE USES. YEAH, YEAH. >> RIGHT. SO WHAT I WAS GETTING AT -- RIGHT, RIGHT. SO KIND OF WHAT I WAS GETTING AT, THE DIFFERENT USES, THERE ARE DIFFERENT LAND USES. THERE IS A MASSIVE BUFFER IN BETWEEN THOSE HOUSES AND THE PLANT FINE. IF IT IS A SIMILAR USE, THEN THE BUFFER DOESN'T HAVE TO BE AS
[00:25:03]
GREAT. IF IT IS WHERE THE USE INTENSITY IS GREAT, THEN THE BUFFER HAS TO ACCOMMODATE THAT. WHETHER IT BE 20 FEET. THERE ARE SOME AREAS -- I GUESS THIS IS AND BY CODE, BUT THERE IS A 200 FOOT BUFFER FROM SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSES TO INDUSTRIAL USE IN TOWN. THAT IS KIND OF HOW IT WORKS.>> I COULD ALSO UNDERSTAND WHY IT WOULD NOT FALL UNDER COMMERCIAL SUPPORT. LIKE WHY THEY ARE BEING CLASSIFIED AS
ROAD SERVICE QUICK >> YEAH. ONCE AGAIN, A LOT OF
THE -- >> HAVE YOU EVER BEEN TO THE ORTHODONTIST QUICK HAVE YOU EVER BEEN TO THE ORTHODONTIST LIKE
THAT? >> YEAH, YEAH. IN AND OUT ALL DAY. I GUESS THE THING HERE, AS IT REMAINS TO BE DETERMINED, JUST THE CUSTOMERS THAT ARE EXPECTING THIS EVERY DAY. AND THEN ALSO THE SIZE THEY ARE GOING TO BE USING. BECAUSE THE MAIN USE HERE, EVEN THOUGH IT IS LIKE AN OFFICE THAT SUPPORTS THIS, IT'S ESSENTIALLY A PARKING LOT. AND THEN ALSO, THEY WANT OFFENSE FOR PROTECTION. ALL THE THINGS. A GATE. THERE IS A LOT OF THINGS HAPPENING WITH THIS. LIKE I SAID, IT'S NOT OUT OF PLACE FOR THE AREA, BUT JUST DIFFERENT INTENSITY FROM THE STANDARD OFFICE USE. PROFESSIONAL STUDIO, PERSONAL OFFICES. NOT A LOT MORE TRANSIENT THAN THE OTHERS, BUT LIKE YOU SAID, THE ORTHODONTIST --
>> I DON'T FEEL COMFORTABLE MAKING A DECISION ON WITH THE USE OF A BUSINESS MAY OR MAY NOT BECOME IN THE FUTURE, THOUGH.
THEY CAN HAVE LESS DENSITY, HONESTLY. SO I AM NOT INCLINED TO MAKE A DECISION ON THIS OPPOSITION. HAVING SAID ALL THAT
-- >> TO ME, IT'S PRETTY CLEAR.
>> ALSO THESE PLACES THAT WERE LARGE ENOUGH THAT WOULD WORK.
>> CAN I GET A MOTION? >> I PUT A MOTION TO DECLINE THE
MOTION. >> OKAY, WE WANT TO DO THAT
FIRST? >> YOU DO NOT HAVE TO VOTE FOR
THE MOTION. >> YOU BE ABLE TO MAKE A MOTION,
BUT VOTE NO ON IT. >> I WILL SECOND IT.
>> LATICIA SMITH . >> REJECT. DID I DO IT RIGHT?
>> OKAY. SO WE DID NOT ACCEPT. BZ 2025-011. IS THERE ANY OTHER
[OTHER BUSINESS ]
BUSINESS FOR TONIGHT QUICK >> YEAH, DO YOU HAVE A QUESTION? THAN I DO. DO WE HAVE A SCHEDULE? TWO THINGS FOR HOUSEKEEPING, THE SCHEDULE HASN'T CHANGED. 4:30, UNLESS WE HAVE EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES OR SOMETHING. BUT I THINK IT WAS THICK WITH THIS. JUST KIND OF ON THE ELECTIONS, EVEN THOUGH WE ARE -- THANK Y'ALL FOR COMING TONIGHT. COUNSEL DID VOTE TO UPHELD -- MARY MAINTAINS HER POSITION AS A SUPERNUMERARY.
THAT WAS ALSO DECIDED. AND THEN JUST KIND OF AN ANNOUNCEMENT, THIS IS ACTUALLY CONNORS LOST -- LAST MEETING.
HE'S SO SHARP. >> CONNOR, WHERE YOU GOING?
>> I GOT A POSITION BACK IN MY HOMETOWN.
>> WAIT, MOVING? >> GOOD LUCK TO YOU AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE OVER THE YEARS.
>> THANK YOU. >> I KNOW, HE IS LIKE A BZA
>> THAT'S ALL WE HAVE FROM A HOUSEKEEPING STANDPOINT. THAT'S
[00:30:01]
>> A MOTION TO ADJOURN FROM SOMEBODY?
>> MOTION TO ADJOURN. >> ALL
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.