[ROLL CALL]
[00:00:12]
COMMISSION. ROLL CALL, PLEASE? ATTENDED ONE OF OUR MEETINGS BEFORE, I WILL GO OVER A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF OUR PROCESS. FIRST THE PLANNING COMMISSION IS PRESENTED WITH AN AGENDA FROM STAFF. THE APPLICANT FOR EACH ITEM WILL BE GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT THEIR REQUEST AND ANSWER QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION. SOME ITEMS ON THE AGENDA REQUIRE PUBLIC HEARING. DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING ANYONE IS WELCOME TO SPEAK FOR UP TO FIVE MINUTES WITH RESPECT TO THE AGENDA ITEM. WE SERVE ON BEHALF OF THE CITIZENS OF AUBURN AND WELCOME YOUR COMMENTS. IF YOU CHOOSE TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PUBLIC HEARING, PLEASE KEEP YOUR COMMENTS GERMANE TO THE ITEM AT HAND AND PLEASE REMEMBER TO SIGN IN ON THE TABLE NEXT TO THE PODIUM. I THINK SOME OF Y'ALL ALREADY HAVE DONE THAT. THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL DELIBERATE ON EACH ITEM BASED ON LOCAL LAWS THE CITY OF AUBURN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND FOR THE GOOD OF THE COMMUNITY. I WILL NOW OPEN UP FOR CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS. THIS IS YOUR OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM NOT BEFORE US TONIGHT ON THE AGENDA. DOES ANYONE WANT TO SPEAK WITH RESPECT TO THE
[CONSENT AGENDA ]
CITIZENS COMMUNITY? SEEING NONE I WILL CLOSE CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS AND MOVE ON TO THE CONSENT AGENDA.>> I'LL MOVE TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA.
>> SECOND. >> EMOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND IT
[5. Preliminary Plat - Woodson Hills - PUBLIC HEARING]
HAS BEEN SECONDED. ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE.>> AYE. >> MOTION PASSES. NOW WE WILL
MOVE ON TO NEW BUSINESS. >> GOOD EVENING. FIRST CASE UNDER NEW BUSINESS TONIGHT IS A REQUEST FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR A 39 LOT SUBDIVISION. THE ROAD. IT'S APPROXIMATELY -- ZONING DISTRICT. THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR THIS PROPERTY IS LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL WHICH CALLS FOR AN AVERAGE DENSITY OF FOUR DWELLING UNITS AN ACRE. THE PLAT SHOWS 39 LOTS, 36 OF WHICH ARE SINGLE-FAMILY CONVENTIONAL RESIDENTIAL LOTS. THERE ARE TWO LOTS LABELED AS FUTURE DEVELOPMENT. AND THERE IS ONE OUT LOT HERE, THE NORTHERN EDGE OF THE PROPERTY. MOORESVILLE CREEK RUNS THROUGH THIS PLOT AND IT IS WITHIN THE 100 YEAR FLOOD PLANE. WHEN ACCOUNTING FOR THE BUILDABLE AREA OF THE SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS, THE DENSITY IS 1.4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE WHICH IS BELOW THE MAXIMUM DENSITY FOR A CONVENTIONAL SUBDIVISION CDB OF FOUR DWELLING UNITS AN ACRE. THE APPLICANT SUBMITTED A CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN THAT SHOWS HEARTWOOD STREET HERE, EXTENDING DOWN TO CONNECT TO BONNY GLEN ROAD. AT SOME POINT IN THE FUTURE. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PLAT, THERE WERE A NUMBER OF STAFF COMMENTS. YOUR TYPICAL RUN-OF-THE-MILL COMMENTS THAT MAY SEE ON A PRELIMINARY PLAT.
THE COMMENT MOST WORTHY OF NOTE IS FROM ENGINEERING AND IT STATES THAT A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED AND THAT AGREEMENT WILL BE BETWEEN THE CITY AND DEVELOPER TO FORMALIZE THE TIMING AND LOCATION OF THAT.
>> ANY COMMENTS? >> I RECEIVED ONE EMAIL ASKING FOR INFORMATION AND THAT IS WHEN THE LADY ON THE TELEPHONE TO
ANSWER GENERAL QUESTIONS. >> THANK YOU.
>> DOES THE APPLICANT HAVE ANY COMMENTS AT THIS TIME? THANK YOU. I WILL NOW OPEN PUBLIC HEARING. IF YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY ABOUT THIS AGENDA ITEM YOU MAY COME FORWARD NOW.
ANYONE? >> I'M JUST SIGNING IN. GO
AHEAD. >> HELLO. MY NAME IS MIKE ARISON AND I LIVE AT 26 BONNY GLEN ROAD. I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT THE PRELIMINARY PLAT. DOES IT CALL FOR A D CELL LANE OR TURN
[00:05:07]
LANE OFF OF HAMILTON ROAD? >> EXCUSE ME. IF YOU COULD PAUSE, THANK YOU. NORMALLY I WILL COVER THIS AT THE OUTSET WITH MUCH LARGER PUBLIC HEARINGS , A LOT OF PEOPLE, SO YOU SHOULD KNOW EVERYBODY SHOULD KNOW WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING WE DO NOT ANSWER QUESTIONS DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING SO PLEASE STATE ALL OF YOUR OPINIONS. WE WILL ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS AT THE END OF THE PUBLIC HEARING ONCE THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED SO IF EVERYBODY HAS QUESTIONS ASK THEM, WE WILL TAKE NOTE OF THEM DURING YOUR TIME TO SPEAK AND THEN WE WILL ANSWER THEM AT THE END INSTEAD OF HAVING A KIND OF Q&A SESSION. THANK YOU. SORRY FOR INTERRUPTING. I SHOULD'VE
CLARIFIED AT THE TOP. >> AND SO IF A D CELL LANE OR TURN LANE IS NOT BEING REQUIRED, WHY IS THAT? THE TRAFFIC STUDY THAT WAS DONE I ASSUME THERE WAS A TRAFFIC STUDY DONE. DID IT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE LARGE AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC GENERATED ON A SUNDAY FOR THE NEW CHURCH THAT IS UP THERE? IT CAN SOMETIMES TAKE UPWARDS OF 20 MINUTES TO GET FROM BONNIE GLEN TOWARDS MILL ROAD DURING SUNDAY AT CHURCH.
>> AND WHAT DOES IT MEAN BY FUTURE DEVELOPMENT CONNECTION TO BONNY GLEN ROAD AND WHAT IS THE TIMING OF THAT CONNECTION? WILL THERE BE ANY TIME FRAMES IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE REST OF THE DEVELOPMENT WHEN IT HAS TO BE COMPLETED BY? IN THIS SUBMISSION IT LOOKS LIKE THE STATUS OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF BONNY GLEN ROAD IS UNCLEAR AND CAN THAT BE CLEARED UP AS TO WHAT THE STATUS OF THE RIGHT AWAY OF BONNY GLEN ROAD IS. AND DOES THE CITY HAVE ANY OTHER PLANS FOR BONNY GLEN ROAD NOT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT? THOSE ARE MY
>> THANK YOU. >> IS THERE ANYONE ELSE AT THIS TIME THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS AGENDA ITEM?
>> EVERYONE, THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR ALLOWING THIS, MY NAME IS KATIE SCHAEFER, I RESIDE AT 2036 BONNY GLEN ROAD. I HAVE SEVERAL CONSIDERATIONS ABOUT THIS PROJECT, HOWEVER I WOULD LIKE TO STATE THAT I'M ACTUALLY PRODEVELOPMENT. I ATTENDED AUBURN'S MASTER OF REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM AND I WOULD BE PERFECTLY FINE WITH THIS IF MY CONSIDERATIONS ARE TAKEN CARE OF. MY MAIN CONCERN IS ACTUALLY THE SAME AS MY NEIGHBOR'S ARE AND THAT IS THE TRAFFIC COMING OFF OF HAMILTON ROAD AS IT STANDS AS WELL AS OUR ROAD, IT IS NOT EVIDENT FROM THE LOT MAP THAT BONNIE GLEN OFF OF HAMILTON ROAD, THERE ARE ACTUALLY TWO SEPARATE BONNY GLEN ROAD'S. ONE IS OFF OF BIT CREEK ROAD. I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S POSSIBLE THAT YOU COULD SHOW THE MAIN PROPOSED LOTS SO THAT EVERYONE CAN SEE WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT.
YEAH. THANK YOU SO MUCH. IF YOU LOOK AT VENT CREEK YOU CAN SEE THE ONE PART OF BONNY GLEN ROAD AND THAT IS ACTUALLY PAVED. THE OTHER HALF IS UNPAVED. ABOUT ONCE PER MONTH WE HAVE TO CALL CITY OF AUBURN TO HAVE CRUSH AND RUN OR SOMETHING DONE SO WE CAN ACTUALLY DRIVE DOWN OUR ROAD AS IT STANDS. THIS DOES NOT APPLY TO EVERYONE ON MY ROAD BUT I HAVE THREE CHILDREN WHO GO TO AUBURN CITY SCHOOLS. I'M VERY PROUD OF THAT I WANT TO SAY.
WHAT I AM NOT PROUD OF IS THAT EVERY DAY WHENEVER I PICK UP MY SEVEN-YEAR-OLD AT THE BUS STOP AT THE END OF OUR BONNY GLEN ROAD, THE UNPAVED BONNY GLEN ROAD BECAUSE THE BUS CAN'T DRIVE DOWN OUR ROAD, I'M AFRAID THAT SOMETHING WILL HAPPEN ON FIVE SEPARATE OCCASIONS THE BUS DRIVER HAS HAD TO HONK AT PEOPLE BECAUSE OF THE CURVE THAT WE SIT IN HER HEAD SHE DOES EVERYTHING SHE POSSIBLY CAN BUT THE BUS CAN'T DRIVE DOWN OUR ROAD. IF THE BUS CAN'T DRIVE DOWN OUR ROAD, I KIND OF WORRY THAT FIRST RESPONDERS CAN'T DRIVE DOWN OUR ROAD AND I HAVE PICTURES IF ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO LOOK AT IT FROM AFTER THE RAINS LAST NIGHT WHERE WE COULD BARELY DRIVE DOWN OUR ROAD. IT WAS OUR UNDERSTANDING WHEN WE BOUGHT OUR HOUSE THAT THERE WAS SOME KIND OF PROPOSED PLAN BY THE DEVELOPER TO PAVE OUR BONNY GLEN ROAD HOWEVER IT'S OUR UNDERSTANDING NOW THAT IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN SO WE ARE ALL KIND OF WONDERING IS OUR BONNY GLEN ROAD, IF EVERYONE KIND OF FOLLOWS MY SIDE OF OUR BONNY
[00:10:01]
GLEN ROAD, THE UNPAVED BONNY GLEN ROAD, IS OUR BONNY GLEN ROAD GOING TO GET PAVED SO THAT THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THAT A BUS , A FIRE TRUCK, AN AMBULANCE, SOMETHING CAN DRIVE DOWN OUR ROAD? SO THAT MY KIDS WILL BE SAFE SO THAT I CAN BE SAFE. THAT IS A VERY BIG CONCERN. I ALSO ON THE OTHER LOT I'M SHOWING THOSE LOTS BEING IN DEVELOPMENT, I'M VERY CONCERNED AS IT STANDS NOW THAT THERE ARE THREE RETENTION PONDS, ONE OF THEM THAT IS ALREADY GOING TO BACKUP TO BONNY GLEN ROAD. IF SOMETHING WERE TO HAPPEN KIND OF LIKE LAST NIGHT, THERE WAS OVERFILL, THAT WOULD ENTIRELY WASHOUT OUR ROAD. WE WOULD BE STUCK AND NOW I'M KIND OF WONDERING WHO IS GOING TO FIX THAT, SO AGAIN, I'M NOT AGAINST THIS DEVELOPMENT. I WANT THAT TO BE SAID. I WILL HAPPILY SELL THESE HOUSES. I JUST WANT TO BE ABLE TO GET TO THE MAIN STREET AND IT'S NOT JUST CHURCH ON SUNDAYS. IT'S EVERY SINGLE DAY. IT'S KIND OF HARD TO TURN LEFT OR TO TURN RIGHT. AS IT STANDS. SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR LISTENING TO ME. THOSE ARE MY CONCERNS. AND BECAUSE IT'S MY KIDS IT'S A SWORD I'LL FALL ON.>> THANK YOU. >> GOOD EVENING, MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMITTEE. MY NAME IS DOROTHY SMITH AND I AM A HOMEOWNER AT 2044 BONNIE GLEN. WE HAVE LIVED IN THIS COMMUNITY OVER 70 YEARS AND I APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK. I AM ALIGNED WITH THE TWO NEIGHBORS THAT JUST SPOKE ABOUT THAT TRAFFIC SO I WANT AD , HAS A TRAFFIC STUDY BEEN CONDUCTED? IF SO, WHAT MEASURES WOULD BE TAKEN TO PREVENT THE ENTRYWAY IMPACT TO MY DRIVEWAY BASED ON THE TRAFFIC? IF SO, MAY I GET A COPY? THE INCREASED DEVELOPMENT COULD LEAD TO DRAINAGE PROBLEMS AND POTENTIAL FLOODING. HAVING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED HOW WOULD THE GREEN SPACES ON THE TREES PRESERVATION -- A LOT OF THOSE TREES GIVE US PRIVACY TO OUR HOMES. HAVE STUDIES BEEN DONE TO ASSESS HOW THE IMPACTS AROUND OUR PROPERTY FAIR? I URGE THE PLANNING COMMITTEE TO REJECT OR RECONSIDER THIS DEVELOPMENT TO ENSURE IT ALIGNS WITH OUR COMMUNITY NEEDS. WE WANT RESPONSIBLE GROWTH THAT CONSIDERS CURRENT RESIDENT CONCERNS WHILE I UNDERSTAND THE NEED FOR DEVELOPMENT, I HAVE SERIOUS CONCERNS ABOUT THE IMPACT THIS PROJECT WOULD HAVE ON DRAINAGE AND FLOODING. MY PROPERTY IS LOCATED DOWN HERE FROM THE PROPOSED SITE AND ANY CHANGE TO THE LAND NATURAL DRAINAGE PATTERNS WILL SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASE THE RISK OF FLOODING. CURRENTLY DURING RAINFALLS WE ALREADY EXPERIENCED DRAINAGE ISSUES AND ADDING SURFACES SUCH AS ROADS AND ROOFTOPS COULD EXACERBATE THIS PROBLEM. I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHAT SPECIFIC MEASURES HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE THAT EXISTING PROPERTIES LIKE MINE WOULD NOT SUFFER FROM INCREASED STORMWATER RUNOFF AS A RESULT OF THIS DEVELOPMENT. HAS A COMPREHENSIVE DRAINAGE AND STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN BEEN CONDUCTED? IF SO WHAT MITIGATION STRATEGIES ARE BEING IMPLEMENTED TO PREVENT FLOODING IN SURROUNDING PROPERTIES. I URGE THE COMMISSION TO CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE LONG-TERM IMPACT ON CURRENT RESIDENCE AND ENSURE THEIR PROPER SAFEGUARDS SUCH AS RETENTION PONDS IMPROVED DRAINAGE, INFRASTRUCTURE, NATURAL BUFFERS ARE IN PLACE BEFORE APPROVING THIS PROJECT. WITH THIS PROPOSED SUBDIVISION COMES NEW ZONING RULES. WILL THE NEW ZONING ALLOW ME TO LEGALLY RENT OUT MY HOME IF NEEDED? ARE THERE ANY SHORT-TERM RESTRICTIONS LIKE AIRBNB IN THE ZONING AREA? WILL THE REZONING IMPACT MY ABILITY TO MAKE MODIFICATIONS SUCH AS ADDING ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS OR CONVERTING MY APARTMENTS INTO A DUPLEX? HOW WOULD THIS AFFECT MY PROPERTY AND POTENTIAL RENT INCOME AS WE HAVE UP-AND-COMING HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES THAT WILL ATTEND AUBURN AND WILL IT AFFECT THEM TO GET A ROOM TO GET EXTRA INCOME. AT THIS POINT I'M ASKING YOU TO TAKE ALL OF THESE INTO CONSIDERATION AND JUST HELP US, YOU KNOW? WE ARE NEIGHBORS.
I'M NOT AGAINST BUILDING AND MAKING MORE HOMES FOR OTHER FAMILIES. BUT WE HAVE BEEN ON THIS LAND FOR YEARS AND YEARS AND YEARS AND YOU ALL KNOW THE SITUATION. YOU ALL KNOW WHAT HAPPENED. SO I'M ASKING YOU, LOOK AFTER THE NEIGHBORS.
>> THANK YOU, MA'AM. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE AT THIS TIME WOULD
[00:15:01]
LIKE TO SPEAK? >> HELLO, MY NAME IS ROBERT, 2029 BONNY GLEN ROAD. I HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS OF MY OWN AND QUESTIONS I WILL ASK ON BEHALF OF ANOTHER NEIGHBOR. MY TWO QUESTIONS ARE WHAT IS THE PLAN FOR MAINTAINING ACCESS OFF HAMILTON ROAD, IS THERE POTENTIAL FOR BONNIE GLEN TO BE REROUTED OR CLOSED? ON THE HAMILTON ROAD SIDE. AND THEN, IF -- IS THERE THE POTENTIAL FOR INSULATION OF CITY WATER AND SEWAGE ON BONNIE GLEN ? THERE CURRENTLY IS NOT. SINGLE RESIDENT BUT I THINK THE METER FOR THAT IS ON PAM ROAD. WOULD THOSE CITY UTILITIES BE BROUGHT DOWN THE ROAD? AND ANOTHER PROPERTY OWNER, JIM PARKER HAS A FEW QUESTIONS HE WANTED ME TO ASK. WHAT RIGHTS DO THE NEIGHBORHOOD PROPERTY OWNERS HAVE TO SWAY CITY APPROVAL ONE WAY OR ANOTHER ON THIS DEVELOPMENT? I THINK INITIALLY THERE WERE SOME LOTS DELETED FROM THE CURRENT PLAT. WHY WERE THEY DELETED FROM THE CURRENT PLAT? INCLUDED IN A LATER REQUEST. WHAT IS THE SITUATION ON TYING BONNIE GLEN INTO THE SUBDIVISION ACROSS THE DEVELOPMENT OF CHAMPIONS? AND WHEN WILL THE CONNECTOR ROAD TO BONNIE GLEN BE COMPLETED IN ORDER TO ACCESS BONNY GLEN ROAD FROM THAT SUBDIVISION? THANK YOU.
>> THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE? >> MR. CHAIRMAN, HAVE ALL THOSE
SIGNED IN? >> I THINK SO. HAS EVERYBODY SIGNED IN? I THINK A LOT OF PEOPLE SIGNED IN BEFORE WE BEGAN. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE? SEE NONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. I THINK WE HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS TO ASK HIM.
>> I WROTE SOME OF THESE DOWN BUT, DO YOU WANT THE CITY TO ANSWER THE BONNIE GLEN QUESTIONS BECAUSE BONNIE GLEN IS PERIPHERAL TO US SO IT'S NOT PART OF OUR PROPERTY, IT'S NOT INSIDE OUR PROPERTY IT'S OUTSIDE OF OUR PROPERTY SO I'LL LET THE CITY ADDRESS BONNIE GLEN AND I CAN ADDRESS THE REST.
>> STAFF, IS THERE ANY ANSWER ON BONNIE GLEN?
THINK YOU ARE TURNED OFF. YEAH. >> I TRIED TO JOT DOWN THE COMMENTS AS THEY WERE COMING OUT. THERE IS NO PLAN RIGHT NOW TO PAVE BONNY GLEN ROAD. WE TALKED ABOUT THEIR CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN AND THEY SUBMITTED WITH THIS THAT WOULD SHOW A FUTURE CONNECTION TO BONNY GLEN ROAD. THE REASON WE MADE THE COMMENT ABOUT A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IS BECAUSE WE WANT TO ENSURE THAT HAPPENS WITHIN A CERTAIN TIMEFRAME AND DOESN'T JUST LINGER OUT THERE. THE SECOND THING IS GOING TO COME IN RIGHT AWAY. SO THAT IS WHAT THAT IS ABOUT.
>> SO YOU ARE SAYING THAT DEVELOPMENT IS GOING TO CONSIDER
THE PAVING OF BONNY GLEN? >> THE CONNECTION FROM THEIR NEW DEVELOPMENT TO BONNY GLEN. SO BONNY GLEN, THE ACCESS, IDEALLY IN THE FUTURE THE NEW DEVELOPMENT WOULD ACCESS HAMILTON. BONNY GLEN WOULD ROUTE WHEN IT CONNECTS TO THE NEW DEVELOPMENT IT WOULD USE THE NEW ACCESS TO HAMILTON. ULTIMATELY THE CURRENT ACCESS WOULD GO AWAY AT THAT POINT, TIMING ISN'T SOMETHING WE CAN PIN DOWN RIGHT NOW. BECAUSE THERE'S OTHER PROPERTY OWNERS INVOLVED. SO THAT'S GOING TO BE FIGURED OUT TO THE DEGREE THAT IT CAN BE FIGURED OUT IN THE NEXT FEW MONTHS AS WE ARE APPROACHING THE WORK ON THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BUT IS GOOD CHANGE IN BETWEEN NOW AND WHEN THEY START BUILDING THE FIRST PHASE AND GET AROUND TO PHASE TWO WHETHER THE DEVELOPER REQUIRES ADDITIONAL PROPERTY THAT COULD COME INTO PLAY AND MAKE SENSE TO ROUTE THINGS SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT THAN WITH THEIR MASTER PLAN SO WE DON'T KNOW AT THIS TIME ON
THAT. >> SO ARE YOU SAYING THAT THE SECTION, THE UNPAVED SECTION OF BONNY GLEN WILL NOT BE USED? IS
[00:20:02]
THAT WHAT YOU ARE SAYING? >> I THINK THE UNPAVED SECTION THAT THEY ARE REFERRING TO IS NORTH OF WHERE THIS NEW DEVELOPMENT WOULD TIE IN SO THAT WOULD JUST REMAIN AS IS FOR NOW.
YUP. >> YEAH, SO ALL THE RESIDENTS LIVE NORTH OF THIS SO THE ISSUES BETWEEN WHERE THIS PROPOSED CONNECTION WOULD BE TO BONNY GLEN IS , I DON'T THINK THERE'S ANY RESIDENTS ON THEIR.
>> NOT ACCORDING TO THIS. >> THERE ARE SOME ON THE PROPERTY BUT THEY COULD ACCESS IT, SO THEY COULD ACCESS EITHER WAY ONCE THIS CONNECTION WAS MADE, THE ISSUE IS ACROSS THAT PROPERTY THERE, THERE IS NO ESTABLISHED RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THERE, IT'S JUST ASSUMED BASED ON WHERE THE ROAD HAS BEEN DRIVEN FOR YEARS. WHICH IS PROBLEMATIC FOR MOST OF THE STRETCH OF BONNY GLEN . THE ONLY TWO SECTIONS WE ACTUALLY HAVE PLOTTED RIGHT AWAY IS WHAT THE CLEVELAND'S DEDICATED SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AND AS WELL AS WHAT CROSSES MR. PARKER'S PROPERTY AT HAMILTON ROAD. THAT IS CORRECT. WE HAVE BEEN MONITORING
THAT FOR YEARS SO, YES. >> EXCUSE ME. EXCUSE ME. THANK YOU. COURT OF ORDER. THANKS. SO, SINCE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSE, I'M GOING TO ASK IF EVERYBODY COULD KIND OF WITHHOLD THEIR COMMENTS UNTIL THE END. A LOT OF APPLICANTS SPEAK AND THEN IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS OR ANYTHING EITHER FOR STAFF OR FOR THE APPLICANT, ASK THE APPLICANTS. THANK YOU.
>> THE OTHER QUESTION WAS, WAS A TRAFFIC STUDY DONE, YES A TRAFFIC STUDY WAS DONE AND SUBMITTED TO THE CITY. THERE WAS QUESTIONS ABOUT TURN LANES ON HAMILTON ROAD. THERE'S TURN LANES YOU SEE ON THIS MASTER PLAN SHOWING A LEFT DASHBOARD FOUND LEFT TURN LANE, SOUTHBOUND RIGHT TURN LANE INTO THE NEW DEVELOPED ROAD. THEY ASKED ABOUT SO, WE'VE BEEN ASKED TO CONNECT OUR PAVED ROAD TO THE UNPAVED ROAD. WE ARE FINE CONNECTING, WE ARE JUST TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHAT'S THE BEST WAY TO CONNECT TO IT FOR OUR PROJECT WHICH IS A FUTURE PHASE. YOU KNOW? WE ARE AGREEING TO CONNECT TO IT BUT THERE'S A LOT OF MOVING PARTS IN REGARDS TO I THINK EVERYTHING THAT'S GOING ON IN BONNY GLEN.
EXCUSE ME, REAL QUICK. COULD YOU PUT THE PROXY MAP BACKUP? I HAVE TO GET AN UNDERSTANDING OF WHERE THIS UNPAVED ROAD IS.
>> THE UNPAVED SIDE IS THE SIDE CONNECTED TO HAMILTON SO IF YOU FOLLOW THE ENTIRETY OF BONNY GLEN AS YOU GO LEFT ON THE MAP I GUESS THE LEFT SIDE GOES INTO THE CHAMPIONS DEVELOPMENT. SO THEY ARE SEPARATED BY A COVERT BRIDGE, ONE LANE ROAD, ROAD, BRIDGE, AND THE OTHER SIDE AS YOU MOVE TOWARDS HAMILTON IS
UNPAVED AND INCREDIBLY STEEP. >> SO THE UNPAVED IS GOING TO
BUMP RIGHT INTO HAMILTON ROAD? >> IT DOES NOW. THE ROAD IS BEEN
THERE 50 YEARS. >> BUT IT'S STEEP?
>> YEAH, IT'S STEVE. WE ARE NOT CHANGING THE ROAD. THESE HOMEOWNERS THAT LIVE ON THE ROAD, WE ARE NOT TOUCHING THE ROAD, OUR DEVELOPMENT IS TOTALLY INDEPENDENT OF BONNY GLEN. BONNY GLEN IS BEEN THERE, IT WAS THERE WHEN THEY BUILT IT IN THE SAME CONDITION, WE ARE NOT CHANGING IT. OKAY? WE'RE JUST TRYING TO BUILD OUR DEVELOPMENT, WE ARE TRYING TO BE GOOD NEIGHBORS TO TIE INTO BONNY GLEN LIKE THE CITY IS ASKED US. THAT'S ALL WE
ARE DOING. >> SO GO BACK TO THE PLAN.
>> BACK TO THE OTHER ONE TO SHOW THE CONNECTION.
>> THERE WE GO. WHAT WAS CONNECTING TO HAMILTON RIGHT NOW, THAT'S THE UNPAVED PIECE GOING THROUGH THOSE TWO
PROPERTIES. RIGHT? >> IT KEEPS GOING BOTTOM TOO.
>> ALL THE WAY DOWN? >> YES. IT GOES EVEN FURTHER
DOWN THEN YOU SEE UP. >> AND YOUR CONNECTION WOULD BE -- THE CONNECTION THAT LOOKS LIKE IT'S GOING NORTH, SOUTH?
THAT WOULD BE THE CONNECTION >> IT'S EAST-WEST ON THIS PAGE.
THE NORTH-SOUTH PIECE THAT YOU SEE, WE DEDICATED THAT RIGHT-OF-WAY SIX MONTHS AGO WHEN WE CONSOLIDATED THIS PROPERTY, WE WON THE PARCEL SO THAT'S THE ONLY TRUE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF BONNY GLEN. THAT WE DEDICATED TO THE CITY AS PART OF A PREVIOUS
ADMINISTRATIVE PLAT . >> OKAY, SO YOU'RE ACCESS FOR YOUR DEVELOPMENT WOULD COME OFF OF HAMILTON UP HERE?
>> BRAND NEW PAVED. >> AND WINSTON HILLS DRIVE OR --
[00:25:01]
I CAN'T READ IT BUT -- >> YEP, YOU GOT IT.
>> I KNOW ONE OF THE HOMEOWNERS WAS CONCERNED ABOUT DRAINAGE.
HER PROPERTY IS ACTUALLY UPSTREAM OF US SO WE ARE GOING TO BE GETTING ALL OF HER DRAINAGE. BONNY GLEN FOR THE MOST PART IS ALL UPSTREAM OF US. OUR SITE DOES NOT -- BONNY GLEN SO I THINK THAT WOULD ALLEVIATE THEIR CONCERNS ON THE DRAINAGE OF BONNY GLEN AT LEAST FROM OUR SIDE. THERE WAS SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT USES. THIS PROPERTY IS ZONED CDD. IT'S THE MOST PERMISSIVE ZONING WE HAVE UP TO 9 1/2 UNITS PER ACRE. I THINK AMBER MENTIONED WE ARE ONLY AT A UNIT AND A HALF ON THIS DEVELOPMENT. THERE'S A LOT OF OTHER USES PERMITTED. WE ARE DOING THE SINGLE-FAMILY CONTEMPLATING WHAT THE OTHER USES ARE GOING TO BE ON HERE. THERE'S PLENTY OF THEM THAT ARE ALLOWABLE BY RIGHT. WHICH WE WOULD HAVE TO COME BACK BEFORE THIS BODY TO SUBDIVIDE IF WE WERE GOING TO DO SOME OF -- OTHER FORM OF ANOTHER HOUSING TYPE SO THOSE ARE STILL UP IN THE AIR, WE WANTED TO GO AHEAD WITH A LARGER SINGLE-FAMILY, THE STATE LOTS NOW AND THEN THAT'S PART OF WHY THE CONNECTION TO BONNY GLEN WE ARE STILL TRYING TO FIGURE OUT EXACTLY WHAT TYPE OF PRODUCT AND WHAT TYPE OF USE WE WILL USE FOR THE REST OF THE
PROPERTY. AND I THINK -- >> WAS THERE ANY OTHER
QUESTIONS? >> TRAFFIC STUDY IS DONE, SUBMITTED TO THE CITY A FEW WEEKS AGO.
>> TIMEFRAME FOR DEVELOPMENT WAS ANOTHER ONE OF THE QUESTIONS
>> WE WOULD LOVE TO GET STARTED HERE AND BE IN THE GROUND IN THE NEXT 90 DAYS, YOU KNOW? IF NOT SOONER. FOR THAT.
>> ANTICIPATED BUILDOUT? >> I MEAN -- YEAH. YOU ARE PROBABLY LOOKING AT, I DON'T KNOW, THREE TO FIVE YEARS PROBABLY? WOULD BE THE AVERAGE HORIZON?
>> REAL QUICK ON TRAFFIC STUDIES FOR THE -- WHAT IS THE PROCESS? THIS IS KIND OF AT THE STAFF. WHAT IS THE PROCESS ONCE YOU RECEIVE A TRAFFIC STUDY, THEN WHAT? HOW DO YOU DETERMINE WHAT MITIGATION FACTORS YOU NEED, ET CETERA? AND HOW DOES THE PUBLIC FIGURE THAT -- UNDERSTANDING OF THAT.
>> I'M NOT SURE HOW THE PUBLIC GETS AN UNDERSTANDING OF THAT.
>> I MEAN, THE RESULTS, THERE'S GOING TO BE SOME KIND OF
RESULTS? >> THE STUDY WOULD GET SUBMITTED AND WE WOULD REVIEW IT TO MAKE SURE WE AGREE WITH EVERYTHING AND HOW THE ANALYSIS WAS DONE. THERE'S A SECTION IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY THAT HAS CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND THAT'S WHERE WE STATE WHAT MITIGATION IS BEING RECOMMENDED BY THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER THAT DID THE REPORT, THERE'S USUALLY FEEDBACK FOR US AND BACK AND FORTH TO DISCUSS IF WE THINK ANY ADDITIONAL MITIGATION IS NEEDED PLUS WE HAVE SOME STANDARD REQUIREMENTS THAT DO REQUIRE CERTAIN TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS REGARDLESS OF WHAT THE TRAFFIC STUDY MIGHT SAY SO ALL THAT GETS LOOKED AT AND TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION UNTIL WE ARRIVE AT A POINT WHERE WE ALL AGREE THAT THE TRAFFIC STUDY IS COMPLETE AND THOSE IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE RECOMMENDED WILL BE IMPLEMENTED IN ENGINEERING PLANS AND BUILT FOR THE PROJECT.
>> ONE MORE QUESTION FOR THE -- SOMEONE ASKED ABOUT MAINTAINING THE ACCESS TO BONNY GLEN AND I GUESS THE ONLY THING THAT WOULD APPLY TO YOU IS WHERE YOU ARE CONNECTING TO BONNY GLEN AND THAT WILL EVENTUALLY BE TURNED OVER TO THE CITY AND IT WILL BE A CITY MAINTENANCE ON THAT PART AND THAT PART WILL BE PAVED.
>> OUR CONNECTION WOULD BE PAVED, YES.
>> EXACTLY. OKAY. THE REST I HAVE A QUESTION FOR STAFF.
SOMEONE MENTIONED CITY UTILITIES THAT THERE IS NONE RIGHT NOW FOR
THOSE RESIDENTS ON BONNY GLEN. >> I'M GOING TO HAVE TO DEFER
THIS ONE. >> I CAN ANSWER THAT. YEAH. THAT IS CORRECT. RIGHT NOW THERE IS NO, WE CAN PROVIDE WATER AND SEWER BUT RIGHT NOW THERE IS NO WATER AND SEWER ALONG BONNY GLEN. YOU WILL NOTICE ONE OF OUR COMMENTS THAT WE'VE BEEN WORKING WITH BRAD ON HAS PROVIDED AN EASEMENT FROM THE NEW CONNECTION ROAD TO BONNY GLEN BECAUSE THAT IS SOMETHING WE ARE LOOKING AT RIGHT NOW IS THE POTENTIAL TO POSSIBLY GET AT
LEAST WATER TO BONNY GLEN. >> OKAY. THAT ANSWERS THAT.
[00:30:05]
>> THAT'S NOT CURRENTLY IN ANY KIND OF PLAN TO DO THAT? IT DEPENDS ON WHAT COMES OUT OF THIS?
>> THAT'S RIGHT. AND WILL THE DEVELOPMENT HAVE WATER AND SEWER
FROM THE CITY? >> I BELIEVE SO.
>> OKAY. SO NOT NECESSARILY THOSE RESIDENTS OFF OF BONNY
>> SO ONE OF THE QUESTIONS HAD TO DO WITH REALLY THOSE USES.
CAN I BUILD A DUPLEX AND CAN I USE SHORT-TERM RENTALS AND ALL THAT KIND OF STUFF? THAT'S ALL SET OUT IN WHATEVER ZONE, WHATEVER THE IS THERE ARE RULES THAT SAY YOU CAN , WHAT IS PERMITTED, WHAT MIGHT BE CONDITIONAL USE WHICH MEANS YOU GOT TO GO THROUGH A HEARING TO TALK ABOUT THAT. SO AND THERE'S QUITE A FEW THINGS LIKE I COULD RAMBLE THEM ALL OFF HERE BUT THERE IS IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN WHAT IT IS THAT YOU COULD DO WITH YOUR PROPERTY IN THE CURRENT ZONING, CALL THAT PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND SAY HEY, I'VE GOT -- HERE IS MY ADDRESS, TELL ME MY ZONING, WHAT CAN I DO? THERE'S A DOCUMENT YOU CAN GO TO ONLINE THAT LAYS ALL THAT STUFF OUT. SO.
>> WITH THIS PARTICULAR ITEM WE ARE APPROVING THE PLAT SO WE ARE NOT CHANGING ANY OF THOSE SIGNING RESTRICTIONS IT'S JUST WE ARE APPROVING THIS PARTICULAR DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE CDD SIGN, SO NOTHING IS CHANGING AS FAR AS WHAT IS PERMITTED.
>> AND I GUESS KIND OF TO ADD TO THAT, THIS ISN'T SOMETHING THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO CHANGE LIKE MIDSTREAM IF -- AT THIS MOMENT THEY HAVE TO DECLARE FOR THE PRELIMINARY PLAT WHAT THE USES ARE GOING TO BE BECAUSE THAT DETERMINES THE DIMENSIONS AND EVERYTHING THAT THEY ARE GOING TO BE SCRUTINIZING AND LOOKING AT AS FAR AS MINIMUM SETBACKS, ET CETERA, ET CETERA SO EVEN THOUGH THERE ARE A LOT OF THINGS PERMITTED BY RIGHT, IT'S NOT LIKE THEY'RE GOING TO COME HERE, DO THIS, WE APPROVE THIS AND THEN WE ARE GOING TO DO THIS THING AND THEN WE HAVE NO SAY IN IT, THAT'S NOT HOW WE GO. BUT DIMENSIONS AND THINGS WE HAVE TO CHANGE SO THEN THERE WOULD HAVE TO BE AT ANOTHER PRELIMINARY PLAT AND OTHER THINGS ASSOCIATED WITH THAT SO, --
>> OTHER ANY MORE COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION?
DO I HEAR A MOTION? >> MOTION TO APPROVE.
[6. Conditional Use - Shinhwa Phase 6 - PUBLIC HEARING]
>> SECOND. >> MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND PROPERLY SECONDED. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. MOTION CARRIES.
>> GOOD AFTERNOON. THIS REQUEST IS A CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL FOR AN INDUSTRIAL USE SPECIFICALLY MANUFACTURING FACILITY LOCATED AT 2555 WEST TECH LANE IN THE INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT. AS YOU CAN SEE, LOCATED WITHIN THE WEST TECH PARK ANNEX AREA JUST SOUTH OF BEEHIVE ROAD AND EAST OF WEST TECH LANE. THE FUTURE LAND USE OF THIS IS ALSO INDUSTRIAL WHICH PROVIDES SUPPORT FOR EXISTING AND FUTURE LAND USES ESPECIALLY INDUSTRIAL PARKS SO WE FEEL THE FUTURE LAND USE IS COMPATIBLE. AS MENTIONED IN THE INTRODUCTION, THIS IS PHASE SIX OF THE DEVELOPMENT WHICH IS THIS APPROXIMATELY 73,000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING THAT'S GOING TO BE BUILT LOCATED JUST TO THE SOUTHEAST OF PHASE FIVE AND THAT PHASE FIVE IS JUST SOUTH OF PHASE 23 AND EAST OF PHASE FOUR SO IT'S ALL IN THERE TOGETHER. AND SINCE THIS PROPERTY MEETS WITH THE PREVIOUS EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE ZONING INTENDED FOR STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST AND WE JUST HAVE BASIC COMMENTS FOR CONDITIONAL USE, NOTHING SPECIFIC.
>> IS THE APPLICANT HERE? I'LL NOW OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? SEEING NONE I WILL NOW CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. APPLICANT, DO YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS? COMMISSIONER, DO YOU HAVE ANY -- DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS AT THIS TIME? DO I HEAR A MOTION?
>> MOTION TO APPROVE CE 2025 001.
>> ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. MOTION CARRIES.
[7. Conditional Use - All Washed Up - PUBLIC HEARING]
[00:35:12]
>> HELLO, EVERYONE THIS IS CONDITIONAL USER -- IN THE CDD.
IT IS LOCATED 1975 MALL BOULEVARD. AND IF YOU SEE, THESE ARE ALL EXISTING BUILDINGS, NO NEW DEVELOPMENT HAS BEEN PROPOSED. TO THE NORTH THERE ARE SOME DUPLEX PROPERTIES IN HERE BUT THEN THERE IS A FENCE THAT KIND OF FORMS A BUFFER IN THE AREA. MOST OF THE LAND USES OF THESE BUILDINGS THAT YOU SEE ARE WAREHOUSES AND -- THOSE KINDS OF USERS. THE FUTURE LAND USE OF THE PROPERTY IS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND ALSO THE SHOP IS CONDITIONAL USE FOR CDD AND SHOULD BE LOCATED AROUND THE COMMERCIAL CENTER BUT ALSO IT IS NOT VISIBLY APPEALING LAND-USE SO IT MIGHT BE LOCATED A LITTLE -- AWAY FROM THE MAIN CORRIDOR'S IN THIS CASE. SO THE LOCATION IS BEFITTING IN TERMS OF THE LAND-USE. AND HERE YOU CAN SEE THE BUILDING LAYOUTS AND THIS IS THE CONCERNED LOCATION AS EVERYTHING IN CONSTRUCTION SO THERE IS NO -- IN THE BUILDING HAS BEEN -- APPROVED IN 2001. SO THERE IS NO CHANGE, NO INTERRUPTION STANDARDS FOR THIS.
THE ONLY CONCERN IS THE NUMBER OF PARKING BECAUSE IT'S A DETAILING SHOP WITH A CAR WASH SO, EXCUSE ME. SO THE CONDITIONS ARE THE CAR STORAGE USED MUST BE LIMITED TO THE PARKING SPACES SHOWN IN THE SIDELINE AND IT MAY NOT BE EXPANDED NO MORE THAN TWO CARS AT A TIME CAN BE TAKEN IN FOR DETAILING AND ANY -- MUST BE STORED INDOORS. OTHER THAN THAT SOME COMMENTS WHERE THIS BUSINESS AS FAR AS THE APPLICANT MEETS THOSE CONDITIONS --
APPROVE IT. THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. THE APPLICANT IS HERE. DO Y'ALL HAVE ANY COMMENTS?
>> COMMISSION ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS AT THIS TIME? DO I HEAR
A MOTION? >> MOTION TO APPROVE.
>> DAVE, YOU NEED TO OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING.
>> I'M SORRY. WE MISSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. I WILL NOW OPEN UP A PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYONE HERE FROM THE PUBLIC THAT WANTS TO SPEAK. SEEING NONE, I THINK THEY ALL LEFT, WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND WE WILL NOW HEAR A MOTION.
>> MOTION TO APPROVE CU 2025-002 WITH CONDITIONS.
>> MOTION HAS BEEN MADE AND PROPERLY SECONDED, ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE. THE MOTION CARRIES. I DON'T HAVE ANY ANNOUNCEMENTS,
DO YOU HAVE ANY ANNOUNCEMENTS? >> NO, I'VE JUST GOT TO SEND Y'ALL AN EMAIL ABOUT GETTING THIS WORK SESSION FOR THE GOAT HILL PUD SET UP. SO THAT'S IT. THAT'S ALL I GOT. YEAH.
>> ALL RIGHT, DO I HEAR
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.