8.c.3. Infrastructure Development Agreement. Holland Homes, LLC DBA College CrossingDevelopment, LLC. Hillcroft Residential Subdivision.

[9. a. Annexation. Owens Family Remnant. Approximately 2 acres. Property located near the intersection of North Donahue Drive and Shug Jordan Parkway. Unanimous consent necessary. Planning Commission recommendation.]

AND THE MOTION CARRIES. ORDINANCES.

>> ORDINANCES ITEM 9 A., CITY COUNCIL TO AUTHORIZE THE ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY TWO ACRES ON A REMNANT OF PROPERTY NOT PREVIOUSLY ANNEXED ON OWEN FAMILY PROPERTY, NORTHEAST CORNER IF THE PARKWAY AND NORTH DONAHUE DRIVE CONNECTION.

UNANIMOUS CONSENT IS NECESSARY. >> SECOND, MOTION TO SECOND.

PROBLEM MOVING FORWARD THIS EVENING? SEEING OR HEARING NONE. ANY QUESTIONS?

COMMENT? >> OK.

>> THE ORIGINAL I GUESS THE TWO ACRES THAT WERE OVERLOOKED, THAT WAS -- THAT ACTION WAS NOT TAKEN IN 1960.

OR IT IS IT '84? KIND OF OLD NEWS BUT I MEAN THIS IS A LONG TIME AGO. TWO ACRES WERE NOT ANNEXED.

>> I THINK IT WAS JUST A LEGAL DESCRIPTION DIS-- DISCREPANCY.

I DON'T THINK THERE WAS ANY INTENT TO MOVE AND THAT PLANNED DIRECTOR MAY BE ABLE TO ADD MORE LIGHT TO THAT.

>> RADIO CANADA HEAR YOU. >> ALL DRESSED UP.

MIGHT AS WELCOME UP. >> THAT IS NOT WORKING EITHER.

>> HELLO. THERE WE GO, PERFECT.

SO IT WAS NOT A DISCREPANCY. THAT WAS AN OLDSECTION LINE THA GOT ANNEXED. REALLY LARGE TRACKS.

THAT LARGER SECTION WASN'T ANNEXED BUT THAT WAS A REMNANT PIECE. CARVED OUT THE SCHOOL PIECE AND TWO ACRE REMNANT THAT NEVER GOT ANNEXED AND WHEN THAT MASSIVE SECTION CAME IN AND OTHER ONES JUST LEFT THAT'S OUT.

WHETHER WOULD HAVE BEEN INTENTIONAL OR JUST SOMEONE DID NOT -- -- ENDED LEAVING TWO ACRES OUT.

THAT IS WHAT HAPPENED. >> THANK YOU FOR THAT

CLARIFICATION. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OK. ROLL CALL LYNDSY?

[9.b.1. Owens Family Remnant Rezoning. Rezone approximately 2 acres from Rural (R) to Comprehensive Development District (CDD) zoning district. Property located near the intersection of North Donahue Drive and Shug Jordan Parkway.]

THE PREVIOUSLY ANNEXED FAMILY PROPERTY REMNANT.

MORE SPECIFICALLY THE REQUEST IS TO REZONE THE APPROXIMATELY TWO ACRES FROM RURAL TO COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. C.D.D. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON NORTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH DONAHUE AND THE PARKWAY. APPROVAL OF THE REZONING,

UNANIMOUS CONSENT IS NECESSARY. >> I WILL ASK FOR UNANIMOUS

CONSENT. >> SECOND.

>> MOTION TO SECOND. ANYONE HAVE A PROBLEM MOVING FORWARD THIS EVENING? SEEING AND HEARING NONE.

OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. IF LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL PLEASE COME FORWARD AND GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD AND HAVE FIVE MINUTES TO SPEAK TO THE COUNCIL.

>> APPRECIATE JUSTICE LEAVING PODIUM DOWN FOR ME AND IN THE RAISING IT UP. I THINK THE MEAT OF THE DISCUSSION MIGHT COME AT A LATER AGENDA ITEM BUT I WANTED TO POINT OUT TYPICALLY WHEN WE TALK ABOUT REZONING TO C.D.D., THIS IS MORE TO ENABLE THE FOLLOWING AGENDA ITEM.

FELT LIKE THE APPROPRIATE THING WITH THE REST OF THE LARGER PARCEL BEING C.D.D. CURRENTLY. JUST WANTED TO STAND UP HERE AND STAY IF YOU HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTION, FEEL FREE TO LET ME KNOW. THANK YOU

>> THANK YOU ELSE? >> OK LOWS THE PUCLOSE -- OK LO

THE PUBLIC HEARING. >> JUST A PIGGIE BACK ON WHAT HE SAID. THIS IS AN INTERMENT MEASURE.

IT WILL GO PRESSURE -- WE WILL LOOK AT IT AGAIN.

WITH THE AIM TO MAKE IT P.D.D. SOME OF THIS I THINK IS D.D.H.,

[00:20:01]

AND WE ARE MAKING THIS C.D.D.AND THIS IS WAY OVER MY PAY GRADE, BUT JUST TO POINT OUT THIS IS COMPLICATED ISSUE FOR THE AVERAGE LEHMANN. WHY C.D.D.? IS IS THERE SOME REASON THAT IT GOES TO C.D.D. AND GUESS TO P.D.D.WHEN SOME OF THE REST OF THE PARCEL IS NOT C.D.D., IF I

AM READING THIS RIGHT. >> I DON'T KNOW THAT IT NECESSARILY MATTERS JUST TIES IN WITH THE CURRENT CURRENT C.D.D.

THE D.D.H. S WILL BE ROLLED UP INTO THE P.D.D., THAT YOU WILL CONSIDER LATER. .

>> WHY DID WE PICK C.D.D.? WAS THERE'S A GOOD REASON THAT I MIGHT BE ABLE TO GRASS GRASP HERE?

>> JUST CAN YOU ADD A BIT MORE TO THAT.

>> ALL RIGHT. SO THE FUTURE USE, REZONING REQUEST, SO THAT LOCATION WAS MASTERPLAN MIXED USE INTENSITY TWO. NORMALLY THAT WOULD BE REALLY MIXED USE OF HIGH INTENSITY DEVELOPMENT, FOCUSSING ON COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS AND THEN ALSO WITH RESIDENTIAL.

C.D.D. IS THE ONLY ZONE DISTRICT OUTSIDE OF THE URBAN AREA THAT ALLOWS FOR. THAT SO C.D.D. THE OBVIOUS CHOICE FOR THE SCENING AND ALSO WITH BEING ACCOMPANIED WITH THE P.D.D., THERE WASN'T A THREAT OF INTRODUCING BY RIGHT SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING HERE SO THAT WASN'T PART OF IT.

STAFF DIDN'T LOOK AT C.D.D., NORMALLY BE I KNOW SOMETIMES WE ARE APPREHENSIVE BUT THAT WAS NOT CASE WITH THIS ONE.

THIS BEING A HIGH INTENSITY CORNER WHERE WE PLAN FOR THE USE AND ACCOMPANIED P.D.D.THAT WOULD BIND IT FROM A USE STAND POINT

AND DENSITY AND EVERYTHING. >> OK.

THANK YOU. >> THAT IS A GOOD POINT.

CAREFUL TO REZONING C.D.D. FOLLOWED BY A P.D.D. TO OVERLAY THAT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OK. LYNDSY WITH THE ROLL CALL.

[9.b.2. Shug Jordan Commercial PDD. Apply the Planned Development District (PDD) designation to approximately 58.92 acres currently zoned Comprehensive Development District (CDD) and Development District Housing (DDH).]

ENTIRETY OF THE LOT, PARCEL. REQUEST TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 58.92 ACRE OF OWEN FAMILY PROPERTY FROM COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT C.D.D. AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT D.D.H. -- FOR THE SHUG JORDAN COMMERCIAL P.D.D.

THIS IS WITH THE CONDITIONS NOTED IN THE ORDINANCE ANDS AND THAT NANCE CON SENT /* /* KENT --S AND THAT CONSENT IS

NECESSARY. >> OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. PLEASE COME FORWARD YOU WILL

HAVE FIVE MINUTES TO SPEAK. >> EVENING.

A LOT MATERIAL ON THIS ONE. OBVIOUSLY PRETTY LARGE PROJECT.

A LOT GOING ON THERE. SO I WILL ATTEMPT TO SPEAK TO THE HIGH POINTS AND IF WE NEED TO HAVE SOME ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION WITH SOME QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE, PLEASE LET ME KNOW. I WILL SAY THIS, YOU KNOW, WHEN WE TALKED ABOUT THIS, AT PLANNING COMMISSION, THERE ARE SOME CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL IN HERE, NUMBER ONE BEING SOME THINGS THAT ARE GOING TO BE EXCLUDED THE P.D.D., THERE IS A LATER AGENDA ITEM THAT SPEAKS TO CONDITIONS USES APPROVED VERSES BY RIGHT. BUT I DID WANT TO POINT TO ALL THE CONDITIONS THAT WERE LISTED FROM PLANNING COMMISSION THAT YOU GUYS HAVE IN YOUR PAQUETTE FOR THE P.D.D.

NO ISSUES FROM THE DEVELOPER ON THOSE CERTAIN CONDITIONS.

I KNOW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SHORT-TERM RENTALS, HOME STAYS BEING PROHIBITED A PROBABLY A BIG THING WE WOULD LIKE TO GET CODIFIED AND WE ARE IN AGREEMENT ON THAT.

MOSTLY ABOUT THE PROJECT, SO THE PROJECT KIND OF BE BROKEN UP INTO THREE MAJOR PIECES. YOU GOT THE KROEGER AND THE ANCHOR COMMERCIAL WITH THE OUT PARCELS ON THE WEST SIDE.

KIND OF THE SHUG GORE >

>>ER DON /* /* -- SHUG JORDAN NORTH DONAHUE.

WE ARE INTENDED TO INSTALL A PUBLIC STREET WITH THE P.D.D.

THAT IS LISTED IN HERE AS WELL THAT WILL CONNECT THE NEW ROADS,

[00:25:04]

ARBOR FARMER, TENSION BUILT BY THE SCHOOL, CONNECT DOWN TO SHUG JORDAN. THERE IS PUBLIC UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE ASSOCIATED WITH THAT.

I THINK ALSO OUTLINED. IN YOUR DOCUMENTS.

AS WELL, AND THEN ON THE EASTSIDE, THERE IS THE 55-PLUS AGE RESTRICTED HOUSING, ABOUT 200 UNITS AND THAT IS THE OTHER REASONS FOR THE P.D.D. WE COULD HAVE DONE WITH REGULAR STRAIGHT ZONING. THE P.D.D. LOCKS US IN TO A MAXIMUM RESIDENTIAL DENSE AND LOCATES ON THAT PARTICULAR PIECE OF THE PROPERTY. THAT WAS THE ONUS OF GOING TO P.D.P. COULD HAVE DONE A STRAIGHT ZONING BUT IT MADE SENSE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT, WHERE IT WAS, AND THE APPARENT NEED FOR THAT IN TOWN.

THAT WE THOUGHT IT WOULD MAKE A TON OF SENSE WITH THE P.D.D.

THERE IS ALSO SOME -- OBVIOUSLY LOT OF MOVING PARTS WITH THE SCHOOL BEING TUCCONSTRUCTED TO NORTH.

PENDING ROAD N'IMPROVEMENT ON NORTH DONAHUE TO THE WEST SO THERE IS A GOING ON IN THE CORNER AND WE ARE EXCITED ABOUT IT. IF YOU GOT ANY EREQUESTS,

QUESTION. >> TALK ABOUT THE GREEN SPACE

REAL QUICK. >> SO THE GREEN SPACE WOULD BE A CITY PARK. I FAILED TO MENTION THAT.

A >> ALL GOOD.

I'M CALLING THE CENTRAL PARK AREA.

I'M SURE ALISON HAS A BETTER NAME FOR THE FUTURE.

THE INTENT THERE IS TO WORK WITH THE CITY ON SOME KIND OF STRUCTURE OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TO BE ABLE TO FIGURE OUT EXACTLY THE BEST WAY TO CONVEY THAT.

IT WILL BE A PUBLIC PARK FOR PUBLIC USE AND THE FINAL HOW THAT LOOKS IS T.B.D. WE WILL WORK WITH ALISON AND THE REST OF THE FOLKS ON STAFF. WE ARE EXCITED.

>> HOWEN LARGE IS THAT AREA? >> WE NEED TO FULLY STRUCTURE HOW THAT IS GOING TO BE DEFINED. IT CAN BE FROM THREE TO EIGHT ACRESEN. BORDER BETWEEN THE CREEK THAT IS CENTRALLY LOCATED AND THE NEW ROAD.

>> CAN YOU EXPLAIN WHY THERE IS NO CONNECTIVITY TO THE OUT PARCEL AND DOESN'T CONNECT OVER TO THE ENTRANCE THAT COME OFF OF

SHUG GORE >>ER DAN PARKWAY.

>> TO THE SOUTH. >> DOESN'T CONNECT OVER TO IS THAT TO SHUG JORDAN PARKWAY. IS THAT ROCK?

>> THERE IS ROCK OUT THERE. DEAF FAMILY.

NO, THE MAIN REASON FOR THAT AND IN THE ON THE CURRENT SITE PLAN, THAT COULD CHANGE. BUT ALL THOSE STREETS INTERNAL OUTSIDE OF THE OBVIOUSLY THE NORTH DON VIEW, SHUG AND NEW ROAD CONNECTING THE ROUND-ABOUT TO SHUG JORDAN, ALL WILL BE PRIVATE OWNED AND MAINTAINED INTERNAL DRIVEWAYS.

WE DID NOT SHOW A CONNECTION AT THIS POINT TO THE NEW ROADS THAT COME DOWN SHUG JORDAN. B PURELY BASED ON SPACING. THEREFORE A WAY TO MAKE THAT ACCESS AND MAKE IT FLOW MORE FREELY AS WE KIND OF DEVELOP A PLAN I THINK THAT WOULD BE A SMART THING TO DO.

WITH THE CURRENT LAY OUT AND HOW WE FEEL LIKE IT WILL THE END UP IN THE FINAL, ACCESS SEEMS LIKE IT MIGHT BE TIGHT TO THAT CONNECTION TO SHUG JORDAN. THERE IS GOING TO BE A FAIR AMOUNT OF TOPOGRAPHY AND YOU CAN TELL BY THE HIGH SCHOOL SITE WAS CLEARED, HOW -- I MEAN THAT WHOLE AREA IS UP AND DOWN.

SO THERE MIGHT BE SOME TOPOGRAPHY CHALLENGES WHEN WE DIVE INTO FOR CONNECTIONED AT THIS POINT.

>> I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT THE OUT PARCELS.

HOW MANY OUT PARCELS ARE THERE GOING TO BE?

>> WE HAVE GOT TWELVE I BELIEVE IS THE TOTAL.

>> RIGHT. OUT PARCELS.

THE BUILD OUT ON THAT'S NOT UNTIL 2035?

>> THAT'S RIGHT. THAT IS THE ANTICIPATED BUILD OUT. .

>> SO I WOULD -- I WOULD IMAGINE YOU GUYS WILL HAVE TO GO AND YOU WILL DO ALL THE EARTH WORK FOR THE ROADS AND YOU WILL CLEAR THAT PROPERTY. THE PROPERTY FOR THE SCHOOL WAS

CLEARED. >> YES, SIR.

>> AND THEN WE ARE GOING TO HAVE ON THIS MAIN CORRIDOR, WE WILL

[00:30:04]

HAVE THESE TWELVE OUT PARCELS THAT WILL BE CLEAR OUT THERE FOR FAIRLY SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF TIME.

WHAT WILL -- WHAT SORT OF LANE COVER WILL BE PUT ON THAT? THIS MAY BE A STAFF QUESTION AS WELL, WHAT -- DO WE HAVE THE ABILITY TO REQUIRE THAT -- THOSE PARCELS TO BE KEPT UP IN A

CERTAIN WAY. >> I CAN SPEAK TO THAT FIRST AND IF YOU WANT TO DIVE IN FROM THE CITY PERSPECTIVE FEEL FREE.

THIS GOES TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF HOW WE WOULD LIKE TO DO THE DEVELOPMENT. THERE IS A LOT OF TOPOGRAPHY.

WE WILL DO A LOT OF MAS GRADING WORK TO ACCOMPLISH THIS.

THE HIGH SCHOOL SITE TO THE NORTH, AS SUCH WE WOULD DEVELOP THE ENTIRE PARCEL WITH THE SITE WORK AT ONE TIME.

THE KRUGER IS INTENDED TO OPEN FALL '28 AND WORKING TO SELL TO DEVELOPMENTS AS SOON AS WE BREAK GROUND.

THEY COULD BUILD OUT QUICKER THAN THAT.

BUT WITH RESPECT TO HOW IT WILL BE LEFT, AT A MANITOBA MUM, JOB LIKE THIS, AND THE SIZE OF THIS JOB, IT'S OBVIOUSLY GOING TO BE OVER AN ACRE SO WE WILL HAVE TO PULL PERMITS FROM THE VERMENT TALL MANAGEMENT TO DO THE SITE WORK AND MANAGE THE STORE WATER CONSTRUCTION AND THEY HAVE GOT STRINGENT STABILIZATION REQUIREMENTS THAT THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE HELD TO BUY THE STATE OF ALABAMA AND THAT WOULD BE MAKING SURE OBVIOUSLY THEY WOULD HAVE TO CONTROL ANY STORM WATER RUN OFF, SEDIMENTATION OR EROSION ISSUE. AS PART THEY WOULD HAVE TO LEAVE IT GLAZED TO PREVENT ANY DINED OF EROSION COMING OFF OF IT FROM THAT PERSPECTIVE. SO YOU SHOULD SEE IF THERE IS OUT PARCELS THAT SIT THERE FOR ANY AMOUNT OF TIME, THEIR PERMIT WOULD REQUIRE THEM TO GRASS IT WILL BE LEFT MORE THAN 13 DAYS WITHOUT BEING WORKED. SO AT THAT POINT IF YOU WILL SAY OUT PARCELS A MINIMUM WOULD BE GLAZ GLAZED GLAZED GRASSED AND GREENED.

>> THEY WOULD HAVE TO MAINTAIN THAT GRASS AND LOOKING NICE AND

WELL KEPT. >> THAT IS CORRECT.

THAT WOULD BE PART OF THE CORRIDOR OVER LAY REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING COORDINATES. I DID MY BEST.

>> THANK YOU. >> MY OTHER QUESTIONS?

>> A QUESTION AROUND SHUG JORDAN, IS THAT PART CONTROLLED BY -- HAS THIS BEEN REVIEWED AS FAR AS THE INGRASS?

>> THEY HAVE SEEN IT. WE LOOKED AT A COUPLE OF DIFFERENT ACCESS OPTIONS WITH THEM AND CONCEPT PLAN.

WE WILL HAVE TO PERMIT EVERYTHING.

NONE IS PERMITTED THROUGH THEM YET BUT WE HAVE SPOKEN WITH THEM. THE CITY ENGINEERS OFFICE HAS SPOKEN WITH THEM PREVIOUSLY. SO THEYARE AWAY THIS IS COME.

RIDE IN, RIDE OUT, THE INTERSECTION AT DONAHUE.

THEY ARE AWARE THIS IS COMING. >> THIS IS RIDE IN, RIDE OUT ONLY. WHAT IS EXPECTED TO BE?

>> AT THE MOMENT, YES, SIR. >> THERE IS NOT A STACKING ISSUE THERE FROM THAT LIGHT THERE AT DONAHUE, DOES THAT CREATE AN

ISSUE? >> NO, SIR.

WE WILL HAVE A RIGHT TURN LANE THAT WILL BE SPECIALLY WITH THE SPEED LIMIT, SHUG JORDAN PARKWAY WILL BE SUFFICIENTLY LONG AND TAPER IN. WHAT YOU ARE SEEING RIGHT NOW IS SCHEME SCHEMATIC. ESPECIALLY IF THE TRAFFIC STUDY

REQUIRES THAT. >> OK.

>> SO THE PROJECT, IS THAT TO THE EAST?

>> THAT IS TO THE EAST OF US. >> THAT HAS TWO PROPOSED ONES COME IN IF I REMEMBER RIGHT IN THE SAME STRETCH OF ROAD?

>> THAT SEEMS RIGHT. I'M STRUGGLE TO RECALL THAT SITE PLAN OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD. I KNOW THEY HAVE ONE OFF SHUG.

>> MAYBE JUST ONE. >> JUST ONE.

>> OK. >> IT'S COUPLE OF THOUSAND FEET AWAY FROM THIS ONE, I THINK. IT IS MUCH CLOSER TO NORTH

COLLEGE. >> THAT WILL BE A SIGNALIZED

INTERSECTION POSSIBILITY? >> WE DON'T KNOW YET.

>> OK. JUST A HEAVILY TRAFFICKED AREA THROUGH HERE. JUST CONCERNING ABOUT TRAFFIC

[00:35:09]

STACK. S.

I KNOW WE PUSH FOR CONTROL, FOR HOPEFULLY GETT CONTROL OVER THI CONNECTION. I HOPE WE CAN CONTINUE TO DO THAT TO CONTROL SPEED LIMS AND WHATNOT.

>> ALSO, SCOTT, WHAT DOESREMIND OF TIME LINE OF THE FOUNDRY.

>> THE PLAN IS WITHIN THE NEXT TWO YEARS TO GET THAT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTED. SO TO YOUR POINT I THINK THAT BRINGS UP CONSIDERATION OF THIS REFORM, OR BOULEVARD EXTENSION, BEING A REDUNDANT CONDUIT TO GET TO THIS DEVELOPMENT SO THAT IT PULLS PEOPLE OFF OF SHUG FOR MORE CLEAN SAFER ACCESS TO THE DEVELOPMENT. NOT HAVING TO DEAL WITH THE

SPEED OF U SHUG PARKWAY. >> THE EXTENSION OVER THE CREEK IS MOSTLY GOING TO BE THE CITY'S RESPONSIBILITY IF I REMEMBER THAT FROM THE FOUNDRY DISCUSSIONS?

>> THAT CORRECT. >> THERE ARE SOME DEVELOPMENT CRICKS FROM THE FOUNDRY AND THIS ONE? OR THE FOUNDRY THE ONLY BUILDING UP TO THAT POINT? IS THAT THE ONLY CONTRIBUTION THEY ARE MAKING IN

>> THE FOUNDRY IS BUILDING UP TO WHERE WE WILL TAKE OVER AND CROSS THE CREEK AND CONNECT TO WHAT THE SCHOOL IS BUILDING AS

PART OF THE SCHOOL'S PROJECT. >> OK.

THANK YOU. >> OK.

>> MY WIFE IS INTERESTED IN THE GAS STATION.

THERE IS GOING TO BE A GAS STATION?

>> YES, SIR. >> I SEE IT OFF OF NORTH

DONAHUE. >> YES, SIR.

>> GREAT. GREAT TO HEAR.

>> YOU ARE NOT THE FIRST PERSON I HAVE HEARD THAT SAID THAT.

>> OK. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE LIKE TO SPEAK? PUBLIC HEARING IS OPEN. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS? >> ONE LAST QUESTION ON THE DONAHUE EXPANSION OF THAT INTERSECTION, HOW DOES THAT TIME OUT WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT AS WELL?

>> WELL, DETAILS TO BE WORKED OUT.

WE ARE ON SCHEDULE TO BID OUR PROJECT.

THERE IS PROBABLY GOING TO BE SOME OVERLAP WITH SOME OF THE WORK THAT THEY WILL BE PROPOSING WITH THE DEVELOPMENT.

WE GOT WORK IN AND CONSIDER. WITH HOW WE PAIR THAT OUT SO WE DON'T HAVE CONTRACTORS TRIPPING OVER EACH OTHER AND THINGS LIKE THAT. BUT THERE COULD BE SOME OPPORTUNITY THERE FOR US TO SHARE THROUGH DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT HOW WE MIGHT PERFORM THAT WORK.

>> JUST MAKE SURE WE ARE NOT DUPLICATING EFFORTS.

>> ABSOLUTELY. WE HAD THE DISCUSSIONS INTERNALLY AND WITH THE ENGINEER.

>> IT IS NECESSARY, I KNOW FOR THE OUT PARCELS BUT IT IS NECESSARY TO HAVE WITH THE ADDITION OF THE REFORMS, EXTENSION TO HAVE THREE CURB CUTS OFF OF NORTH DONAHUE FOR

THIS DEVELOPMENT. >> SO ONE OF THOSE IN ADDITION TO YARD REFORMS, MAY BE IS ANTICIPATED TO BE A SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION. THE OTHER TWO WOULD BE RIDE IN

RIGHT OUT. >> YES.

>> OK. AND I APPRECIATE THAT.

HOWEVER, WE HAVE THAT SITUATION AT THE PUBLIC CREEK AND IT IS NOT ENFORCED AND THERE IS NO ENFORCEMENT BECAUSE IT IS A PRIVATE PROPERTY. SO HOW ARE WE GOING TO ENFORCE

THAT AT THIS JUNCTURE? >> THERE IS WAYS WE CAN LOOK AT THAT. I THINK THIS IS OUR STREET.

WE WILL BE ABLE TO TAKE MORE PRECAUTION.

THAT IS WHAT YOU ARE REFERRING TO IS THE ONE ON COLLEGE STREET.

SO WE WOULD WITH THIS BEING OUR STREET WILL BE ABLE TO TAKE SOME ADDITIONAL PRECAUTION IF THAT BECOMES AN ISSUE.

>> YEAH, A DAILY OCCURRENCE THAT PEOPLE MAKE A LEFT TURN.

>> UNDERSTAND. >> YEAH.

>> RIGHT ROH N-- RIGHT NOW WE HAVE ISLANDS.

WE DON'T WANT TO MAKE DUPLICATE EVIDENTS.

STILL HAVE THOSE RAISED ISLANDS TO PREVENT MOVEMENT US A CROSS

[00:40:05]

FIVE LINES. >> AROUND THE PARK PIECE, IS THIS SOMETHING THAT WILL BE MAINTAINED BY THE CITY STAFF, PARKS AND REC STAFF OR DEVELOPED WITHIN DEVELOPMENT, H.O.A.?

>> IS THAT P.D.B.IN >> THE DIVISIONER HAS INTEREST OF CONVEYING THIS TO THE CITY. SHOULD THE CITY ACCEPT THE CONVEY YENS AND WHATEVER FORM THAT PLAYS OUT.

THEN YES THE CITY WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THAT. WE HAVE HAD A LOT OF DISCUSSIONS ABOUT THAN WHATTE-- AND WHAT IT BE.

DONE AT OTHER PLACES WHERE THEY ARE PROVIDING A CENTRAL PARK AMENITY TYPE. WITH THE ANTICIPATION HAS BEEN LIKELY BE CONVEYED TO THE CITY AND SEE HOW THAT PANS OUT.

WE WILL MAKE THAT RECOMMENDATION TO YOU.

>> ANYONE ELSE? ROLL CALL.

[9.c. Zoning Ordinance Text and Table Amendments to establish regulations for retailers of Consumable Hemp Products. Planning Commission recommendation. Unanimous consent necessary. Public hearing required.]

>> OK. MOVING ON TO ITEM 9 C A REQUEST TO APPROVE ZONING ORDINANT TEXT TO ESTABLISH REGULATION FOR RETAILERS OF CONSUMABLE HEMP PRODUCT.

PLANNING COMMISSION REDE RECOMMEND APPROVAL.

UNANIMOUS CONSENT IS NECESSARY AND PUBLIC HEARING IS REQUIRED.

I WILL INTRODUCE AND ASK FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT.

>> MOTION. >> NANYONE INTEREST A PROBLEM MOVING FORWARD? SEE AND HEARING NONE.

YOU HAVE FIVE MINUTES TO SPEAK TO THE COUNCIL.

SEEING NO ONE WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? .

>> QUESTION AND EXCEPT. PLEASE.

>> THIS ESSENTIALLY CODIFIES WHAT WE DID ON 17 MARCH AT THE COUNCIL MEETING. THE INTENT IS TO CODIFY WHAT WE VOTED ON. 17 MARCH.

>> SO 17TH MARCH YOU ACCOMPLISH SOME CERTAIN CRITERIA AS FAR AS GOING IN AND ESTABLISHING THE DISTANCE THAT A -- HEMP PRODUCTS CAN BE SOLD WITHIN PROXIMITY TO OTHER ESTABLISHMENTSES LIKE CHURCHES AND SCHOOLS AND THINGSES OF THIS NATURE.

THIS PROVIDES MORE DESIGN STANDARDS OF WITH EXPECTATION ARE OF THOSE. I WILL ASK THE PLANNING DIRECTOR

TO ELABORATE FURTHER ON THAT. >> SO THIS WENT FURTHER.

I THINK THE INITIAL ONE THAT YOU -- THERE WE GO.

. OK.

SO THIS IS WENT FURTHER AND THIS ESTABLISH ZONING DISTRICT, THAT TIED TO THE ZONING DISTRICT SO WE HAVE BEEN HEARING THIS UNDER USES AND DIDN'T HAVE ANY REGULATIONS AND YOU ESTABLISHED THE BUFFER ZONE, AROUND CHURCH'S PLAYGROUND AND COMMON INTEREST AREAS OR IDENTIFIED. THIS LOOKED AT EXCLUDING THESE FROM RESIDENTIAL AREAS. SO ALL THE SOZONING DIRECT.

NOT HIGH INTENSITY BY MIXED USE DO DISTRICT. RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, KIND OF LIKE D.D.H., N.C., L.O.R.D., IT IS THE A PROHIBITED USE.

I THINK L.O.D. IS ALLOWED IN NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING CENTER AND SO THOSE ARE VERY SPECIFIC, VERY NICHE.

ONLY ALLOWED AREAS WHERE EXISTING COMMERCIAL CORRIDORS THAT ALREADY ENTERTAINING THOSE MIXED USES.

>> PUT ON THE PRODUCTS, I BELIEVE THE PASSAGE OF ANY HEMP ORDINANTS OR CONSUMER HEMP PRODUCT TO BE A MISTAKE.

IF WE PASS THIS WE ARE LEGALIZING THE SALE OF CONSUMABLE HEMP PRODUCT WITH THE MISTAKEN BELIEF THEY ARE SAFE AND GOOD. FOR OUR COMMUNITY AND I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT IS TRUE. I WILL BE VOTING NO.

>> WE NEED CLARIFICATION ON THAT.

WE ARE NOT APPROVING THIS SALE. IT'S -- WE ARE TEXT AMENDMENT

[00:45:03]

THAT THE STATE HAS GIVEN THAT AUTHORITY AND WE ARE DEMONSTRATING OR STATING WHERE IT CAN AND CAN'T TAKE PLACE.

>> THAT IS CORRECT. ESTABLISHING THE ZONES OF -- WHICH THESE COULD BE PLACED. YOU ARE RESTRICT THE PROXIMITY WHICH THEY HAVE TO BE AWAY FROM CERTAIN ESTABLISHMENTS.

THIS ESTABLISHES FOR CODIFYCATION WHERE THEY CAN'T BE

CONSIDERED. >> A BUSINESS WERE TO WANT TO OPEN A CONSUMABLE HEMP PRODUCT RETAIL SORE, THEY WOULD STILL BE REQUIRED TO COME FOR KM APPROVE IN FRONT OF THE BODY BASED OFF

THE TEXT AMENDMENTS? >> THAT IS CORRECT.

-- IT WAS MUCH MORE LOOSELY DEFINED THAT.

THIS PROVIDES MORE DEFINITIVE -- PUTS MORE IN THE BOX WHERE THIS

CAN BE APPLYED. >> THIS IS NOT APPROVING THIS SALE OF HEMP PRODUCTS THROUGHOUT THE CITY OF AUBURN.

THIS IS JUST AMENDED THE TEXT, ZONING TEXT ORDINANCE TO STATE WHERE THE KIND OF THE RULE OF ENGAGEMENT AND IT STILL REQUIRES CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL BY THIS BODY FOR EACH TIME SOMEONE WANTS TO OPERATE OR CHOOSES TO COME BEFORE THIS BODY?

>> THAT IS CORRECT. THE STATE ACCOMPLISHED THE LEGALIZATION OF THE SALE OF THE PRODUCTS.

YOU'RE ESTABLISHING BOUNDARIES TO WHERE IT CAN BE APPLIED.

>> UNDERSTANDING THAT.

>> TAKE AWAY THE AUTHORITY IN THE FUTURE?

>> PEOPLE CAN BRING FORT. I -- IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THEY CAN BRING FORTH A REQUEST FOR ANY ZONING DISTRICT AND COULD BE APPLIED AS A CONDITIONAL USE FOR ALL OTHERS.

>> THIS IS A MORE RESTRICTIVE APPROACH THAN WHAT WE HAVE DONE.

THIS ESTABLISHED AS A CONDITIONAL USE AND NOT PERMITTED ANYWHERE. THE ONE APPROVE, WHICH IS UNIVERSAL THROUGHOUT THE CITY. COULD GO ANYWHERE.

COULD BE CONSIDERED LIKE I SAID ON SMALLER ROADS.

IT DIDN'T MATTER. THIS WAS A STEP TO MAKE IT MAKE SENSE. PROVIDE FOR AN -- AND NOT JUST KIND OF OUT OF CONTEXT TRYING TO M MAKE OUR BEST GUESS. THIS WILL ALLOW A STANDARD PROCEDURE TO TREAT THEM ALL ACROSS THE CITY.

>> THIS GIVES US MORE AUTHORITY IN ENFORCING THIS STUFF?

>> YES. >> THANKS.

>> THE HEMP PRODUCTS HAS NOT BEEN A DEFINITION?

>> HAS NOT BEEN A DEFINITION. THOSE ARE MURKY WATERS.

WE DON'T HAVE SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ASSOCIATED WITH IT OR PRESCRIBED BUFFERS. THERE WAS A DONE BUT A COLLABORATIVE EFFORT WITH THE STAFF, BUT ACROSS ALL DOCUMENTS

IMPACKED IMPACTED BY IT. >> WE SEE A RESPONSE FOR APPROVING THE LICENSE FOR THESE AS BELL.

>> THEY HAVE TO GET AN A.B.C. SIGH LICENSE JUST LIKE

RETAIL. >> THERE IS A CHECKPOINT THERE.

AND CHECKPOINT WITH THIS USE NEWS

>> THAT IS CORRECT. YOU WILL NOTICE, THREE DIFFERENT SECTIONS WHERE THERE IS THE CONSUMABLE HEMP, OR STAND ALONE.

CONSUMABLE HEMP WITHIN A PHARMACY AND THEN THERE'S JUST I

THINK ANOTHER ONE AS WELL. >> RETAIL -- FOOD.

MAKES THEM DISTIPPING AND STATE REGULATION ASSOCIATED WITH EACH OF THOSE AS WELL. SO THIS GIVES US PROBLEM -- PROVIDES A LOT MORE CLARITY THAN WHAT WE ARE OPERATING UNDER IN

THE PAST FEW MONTHS. >> DO WE HAVE ANY IN EXIST FENCE

TODAY THAT WOULD NOT FALL UNDER? >> WE DO NOT.

THE ONE THAT WAS APPROVED. IS THE ONLY ONE AND THERE ARE SEVERAL MOVING THROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION RIGHT NOW.

WE HAVE HAD TO TURN A FEW AWAY BECAUSE OF THE CITY CODE THAT

WAS PASSED. >> THANK YOU.

>> THAT WOULD INCLUDED THE PRIOR STORE LIKE 101 SMOKE SHOP ON SOUTH COLLEGE AND THE OTHER ONE CROSS FROM THE WING PLACE, 1 WILL 100 BLOCK OF SOUTH -- 1,100 BLECK OF SOUTH COLLEGE.

>> YEA. >> THANK YOU, JUSTICE.

THANK YOU. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?

[00:50:06]

>> LYNDSY WITH THE ROLL CALL.

[10.a.1. 527 Temple Street. Performance residential use (multiple unit development). Property located at 527 Temple Street.]

. >> RESOLUTION.

>> ITEM 10 # A ONE, REASONABLE USE APPROVAL FOR PERFORMANCE RESIDENTIAL USE, MULTI UNIT DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY LOCATED A 527 TEMPLE STREET. APPROVAL OF THIS CONDITIONAL USE WITH CONDITIONS A PUBLIC HEARING IS REQUIRED.

. >> MOVE FOR APPROVAL.

>> SECOND. >> MOTION AND SECOND.

>> MOTION WE POSTPONE THIS ITEM UNTIL THE FIRST CITY COUNCIL

MEETING IN JUNE. >> DO I HAVE A SECOND?

>> REAL INTO THE MINUTES. GET THE DATE.

>> THIRD. I THINK THE THIRD OF JUNE.

>> JUNE 2ND. >> JUNE 2ND.

>> WEHAVE A MOTION TO POSTPONE UNTIL JUNE 2ND.

>> COMMENTS? >> THE REASON THAT I -- IS THAT WE ARE MINUS WITH TWO OF OUR COUNCIL MEMBERS.

ONE OF WHOM THIS ITEM IS IN THEIR WARD.

AND I THINK BOTH WOULD LIKE THE OPPORTUNITY TO DELIBERATE ON

THIS ITEM. >> IT WOULD MOVE WITH THE ITEM?

>> THAT IS MY RECOMMENDATION. >> WE HAVE FOLKS.

>> WHAT IF THEY HAVE A TIME TO SPEAK DURING THE END OF THE

MEETING? >> THAT IS FINE WITH ME.

>> THAT IS ALL RIGHT WITH ME. >> PUBLIC HEARING CAN STILL

TRAVEL. >> MAY MIGHT NOT BE PAYABLE TO

COME BACK NEXT TIME. >> IS THAT OK.

WOULD YOU ALL LIKE TO SPEAK AT END AND SPEAK AGAIN IN TWO

WEEKS. >> YOU WILL JUST WAIT UNTIL JUNE 2. .

>> OK. WE HAVE A MOTION TO POST UNTIL JUNE 2ND. ALL RIGHT.

ALL IN FAVOUR PLEASE SAY AYE. OPPOSED? THAT MOTION CARRIES. WE WILL HEAR THIS AGAIN IN THE

[10.a.2. Contractor Buildings. Commercial and entertainment use (contractor buildings). Property located at 1009 Country Club Drive.]

NEXT MEETING ON JUNE 2ND. ALL RIGHT.

ITEM 10 "A" 2, COMMERCIAL AND ENTERTAINMENT USE, CONTRACTOR BUILDINGS, ON PRO LOPE KATED AT 1009 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE.

THAT PUBLIC HEARING IS REQUIRED. >> MOVE FOR APPROVAL.

>> SECOND. >> MOTION AND SECONDER.

AT THIS TIME WE WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IF I WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS GIVE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. YOU HAVE FIVE MINUTES TO SPEAK

TO THE COUNCIL. >> WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS TO THE

COUNCIL? >> THIS IS ALMOST AN ACRE AND A HALF, JUST ROUGH -- IT IS A BIG CHUNK OF GROUND.

AND THE OUTSIDE NEIGHBOR IS THE C.S.X. RAILROAD.

I MEAN THAT IS GOING TOPPING BE THE BORDER ON ONE SIDE.

AND WOULD THERE BE ANY BUFFERING REQUIREMENTS BESIDES THAT? I DON'T KNOW THAT THERE NEEDS TO BE A LOT.

>> PLAN DIRECTOR? >> WELCOME BACK.

>> THANK YOU. SO THERE WILL BE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS BUT JUST KIND OF AS YOU NOTED, IT IS C.R.D.S. IS ONE OF THE MORE PER MISIVE ZONE AND EVERYTHING ON COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE IS REALLY JUST KIND OF SENATORING OF USES.

THERE IS A TOW TRUCK COMPANY, RESIDENCE, MIXED USE ON THE OTHER SIDE. THE BUFFER, SO JUST FOR EVERYBODY, BUFFERING IS DERIVED FROM THE LAND USE INTENSITY OF EXISTING LANCE USES SO IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT IT IS NOT THAT INTENSE TO -- NOT THAT DIFFERENT FROM THE NEIGHBOR THE BUFFERING WILL NOT BE THAT INTENSE. I THINK WHEN WE TALKED ABOUT IT IN THE -- THERE WILL BE AVERAGING DOWN TO FIVE IN SOME PLACES AND TEN IN OTHERS. BUT THIS IS NOT OUT OF PLACE AT ALL WHERE THIS IS -- WHAT WOULD BE PERCEIVED A MIXED USE.

SO IT IS NOT TOO MUCH OF A CONCERN FROM STAFF'S POINT OF

VIEW. >> YOU THINK THIS USE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD, I MEAN, DO WE STRIVE TO GET COMMERCIAL USE IN HERE? DO WE STRIVE TO GET MIXED USE? MORE RESIDENTIAL?

>> SO C.R.D.S. IS REDEVELOPMENT SUBURBAN.

IT'S REALLY AKIN TO C.D.D., STEP BELOW INDUSTRIAL.

[00:55:01]

THIS IS IS A PERFECT AREA FOR IT.

ANOTHER AREA IN TOWN MIRRORS THIS AREA ON COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE.

A LOT OF THE USES ON -- WE HAVE A LOT OF PEOPLE WORKING ON DETAILING SHOPS, INTERNAL WORKSHOPS.

JUST ANOTHER WIDE VARIETY ARRAY OF USES.

A LOT OF THINGS ARE PERMITTED, DUE TO ONE, THE ACCESS, IS SLAMMED UP AGAINST THE RAILROAD AND NOT A LOT OF CONNECTIVE OPPORTUNITY. SO THIS IS A GOOD USE FOR IT.

THIS WILL BE PEOPLE WORKING -- WHO HAVE WORK TRUCKS WHO MAY NOT HAVE AN OFFICE AT THEIR HOUSE DO NOT WORK IN THEIR DRIVEWAY BUT THIS GIVE THEM A PLACE TO WORK. WHATEVER BUSINESS THEY ARE PURSUING. APPLICANT HIMSELF AS A LOT OF STRINGENT REGULATIONS FOR HIS TENANTS.

THIS IS THE AREA THAT IT WOULD BE LIKE I SAID, AKIN TO -- UP AGAINST THE BOULEVARD IS WHERE WE SEE THIS TYPE OF USES.

>> I FEEL LIKE THIS IS AN APPROPRIATE USE.

GOOD PROJECT AND HAPPY TO SEE THIS AREA REDEVELOPED AND IN

THIS WAY. >> ANY OTHER COMMENTS, QUESTIONS? OK WE HAVE PLOTION TO SECOND.

ALL FAVOUR, PLEASE SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED?

[10.a.3. Harris Avenue Townhomes. Performance residential use (townhomes). Property located at 424 Harris Avenue.]

MOTION CARRIES. OK.

ITEM 10 "A" THREE. PERFORMANCE RESIDENTIAL USE TOWNHOMES FOR THE HARRIS AVENUE TOWNHOME ON LOCATED AT 424 HARRIS AVENUE. THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THIS ITEM.

WITH CONDITIONS. AND PUBLIC HEARING IS REQUIRED.

>> SECOND? MOTION SECOND.

THIS TIME WE WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IF I WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL, PLCOME FORWARD, TO GIV YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. ANY COMPMENTS OR QUESTIONS? OK. ALL IN FAVOR PLEASE SAY AYE.

[10.a.4. Shug Jordan Commercial Conditional Use. Mixed Use Development. Property located on the northeast side of North Donahue Drive and Shug Jordan Parkway Intersection.]

OPPOSED? THE MOTION CARRIES.

ITEM 10, "A" 4, MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT FOR THE SHUG JORDAN COMMERCIAL P.D.D., ON PROPERTY LOCATED NORTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH DONAHUE DRIVE AND SHUG JORDAN PARK BEACH THIS WILL APPLY CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL, TO SPECIFIC USES FOR THE P.D.D.S. PIECES PREVIOUSLY APPROVED. PUBLIC HEARING IS REQUIRED.

>> SECONDED. >> MOTION SECONDED.

TIME WE WILL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IF I WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL PLEASE COME FORWARD AND GIVE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.

YOU HAVE FIVE MINUTES TO SPEAK TO THE COUNCIL.

>> RAISE THE PODIUM UP. >> REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT.

I WILL BE MORE BRIEF ON THIS ONE.

THERE IS A LOT OF STAFF RECOMMENDED USES IN THE REPORT.

THERE IS A LOT OF STUFF THAT WILL BE BY RIGHT VERSES CONDITIONAL AND THERE ARE ALSO PROHIBITED USES DEFINED IN THE P.D.D. NO OBJECTIONS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT OR THE DEVELOPER ON THOSE THAT WERE LISTED.

I THINK IT WAS COMPREHENSIVE AND MOST OF THESE -- SOME CAN KIND OBSCURE BUT THOSE ARE PULLED STRAIGHT OUT IF ZONING ORDINANTS TO MAKE SURE ALL THAT WAS KIND OF LOCKED IN WITH THIS.

ANY QUESTIONS YOU GOT? FEEL FREE TO LET ME KNOW.